WOAH!! those are lawn mower sized turbos yo...i wouldnt even consider running one of those.. they would be WAY too restrictive..comparing those to a K03, makes the K03 look HUGE..if they had a model number, they would prolly be a K01.. hahaha
Quote from: R.O.R-2.0 on August 15, 2012, 12:44:28 pmWOAH!! those are lawn mower sized turbos yo...i wouldnt even consider running one of those.. they would be WAY too restrictive..comparing those to a K03, makes the K03 look HUGE..if they had a model number, they would prolly be a K01.. hahahaTurbo go-kart.
If you have the spare time and skill to run twin turbos it would be awesome! I'm no mathematician and I don't think the calcs are as easy as "it spools on a 1.3, two should spool on a 2.6" but I bet running them parallel on the 1.6 would work.
Quote from: mystery3 on August 15, 2012, 10:59:10 pmIf you have the spare time and skill to run twin turbos it would be awesome! I'm no mathematician and I don't think the calcs are as easy as "it spools on a 1.3, two should spool on a 2.6" but I bet running them parallel on the 1.6 would work. besides the fact that you have to have 2 of everything with twin turbos..it would get real full real quick with twins in there..atleast compounds use one intake and exhaust stream, not 2 independent ones..
There is absolutely no advantage whatsoever to parallel twin turbos over a single appropriately sized turbo unless plumbing is difficult as in a V or H type motor where running runners to a single turbo is very challenging. To do so on an inline 4 would be an incredible waste of time and effort considering single turbos of just about every inclination (small, medium, big, VGT, etc...) are available as bolt-on options.