enough boost is when you have 3 dimple marks in the hood from the valve cover nuts..
thats one of the best vids ever.. i was worried when the loaded convert came rollin round.. best 8min ever.. p.s. let your kids see it.. may make hem think why a seat belt was invented.. as well.. no way those people used them..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xwc54G2Ur8Please watch as it is a classic!
I drive another car, a Honda civic with independent on all 4 corners and I can tell the difference.
Are your struts blown?
There is a ton of play between sides of the rear suspension, if you dont believe me. Remove your shock assemblies with the rear end up off the ground and see how much you can flex the two sides from one another. Can probably get almost a foot of "twist" out of the beam.
i've seen this discussed alot and even done before.im not a race car driver or an engineer or anything, but in my opinion it's completely pointless, the torsion beam is just as good as any independent rear end, especially on fwd it's just there to go along for the ride. my biggest argument for it, is look at any car with an irs, they all use a sway bar, and for performance they put a much bigger rear sway bar on, why not have ur whole rear suspension be one big sway bar? i remember when they first came out with the kia forte koup, and all the dumb dumbs were saying that its nice that it has good hp but a shame it doesn't have a true irs. the car that holds the record for the fastest fwd lap time around the nurburgring is the renault megane, and it has a rear torsion beam suspension. many people will argue irs is better, and sure even on paper i'd think it would be since theyd seem control the geometry better, but in real life its just not true. its funny also, look at the mustang vs current camaro and challenger, mustang has the solid axle with multi link, camaro and challenger have irs, and every magazine i have rear says the mustang does circles around the other two