Author Topic: Garrett GT2056 turbo  (Read 31195 times)

Reply #60May 01, 2011, 10:55:30 pm

vanagonturbo

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 639
    • Fine Tuning
Re: Garrett GT2056 turbo
« Reply #60 on: May 01, 2011, 10:55:30 pm »
Yeah, I saw that as well. at some point during my searching, I seem to recall it was a 2052. Not sure which version though..

Reply #61May 01, 2011, 11:31:32 pm

RabbitJockey

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 5064
  • Personal Text
    America, DUCK YEAH!!!
Re: Garrett GT2056 turbo
« Reply #61 on: May 01, 2011, 11:31:32 pm »
yeah i could find people discussing a 2052, but they were never specific on which one, and whether or not that was the on that came in the kit
01 Jetta TDI 100% stock daily
81 Rabbit:TDI-M ported head, Frank06 cam, PD intake, hybrid T3 turbo, Renault intercooler, Syl20 11mm pump, light weight fw, and yellow California Clutch clutch kit

Reply #62May 02, 2011, 08:47:20 pm

vanagonturbo

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 639
    • Fine Tuning
Re: Garrett GT2056 turbo
« Reply #62 on: May 02, 2011, 08:47:20 pm »
I bet its the 2052-3 ;)

Reply #63May 04, 2011, 12:36:41 pm

vanagonturbo

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 639
    • Fine Tuning
Re: Garrett GT2056 turbo
« Reply #63 on: May 04, 2011, 12:36:41 pm »
Alcaid, do you have an opinion on the 2052-3?

Reply #64May 04, 2011, 11:13:26 pm

vanagonturbo

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 639
    • Fine Tuning
Re: Garrett GT2056 turbo
« Reply #64 on: May 04, 2011, 11:13:26 pm »
A little more poking around on squirrelperf and I got this:



This is with inputs of 70% efficiency across the board, max hp 200, sea level, max rpm 6k, 1.6l, target AF 19, bsfc .35, max boost at 3800 and min boost at 3000. Does anyone see anything wrong with my numbers?

Reply #65May 05, 2011, 12:10:16 am

vanagonturbo

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 639
    • Fine Tuning
Re: Garrett GT2056 turbo
« Reply #65 on: May 05, 2011, 12:10:16 am »
For reference, here is the same criteria plotted with the 2056.



This seems congruent with my findings. Feel free to add any corrections..

Reply #66May 05, 2011, 01:41:28 am

RadoTD

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 513
  • Personal Text
    Stage WTF
Re: Garrett GT2056 turbo
« Reply #66 on: May 05, 2011, 01:41:28 am »
The only number that seems funky to me there is the min boost at 3000rpm... you should be well spooled by then. It probably doesn't make much of a difference, I think it just means you'll be further into surging territory at moderate rpm levels

With the K14 map, however, it hasn't plotted everything because you're WAY above the map's pressure ratio. The top of the K14 map is about 2.6, but with the numbers you gave returned a pressure ratio of about 3.2, or 32psi. Too much for a K14. The annoying thing is that the flow (~.15m^3/s) is just about right.

enough boost is when you have 3 dimple marks in the hood from the valve cover nuts..  ;D

Reply #67May 05, 2011, 03:25:01 am

Alcaid

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 549
Re: Garrett GT2056 turbo
« Reply #67 on: May 05, 2011, 03:25:01 am »
Alcaid, do you have an opinion on the 2052-3?

20lb/min of air is too wimpy ;)
'03 VW Golf PD130 4Motion Highline
'10 VW Passat 1.6TDI Highline
'83 VW Jetta 1.6TD, 11mm pump, H-beam rods, girdle, fully reworked AAZ head +++ Going Compound ;)

Reply #68May 05, 2011, 11:17:47 pm

vanagonturbo

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 639
    • Fine Tuning
Re: Garrett GT2056 turbo
« Reply #68 on: May 05, 2011, 11:17:47 pm »
The only number that seems funky to me there is the min boost at 3000rpm... you should be well spooled by then. It probably doesn't make much of a difference, I think it just means you'll be further into surging territory at moderate rpm levels

With the K14 map, however, it hasn't plotted everything because you're WAY above the map's pressure ratio. The top of the K14 map is about 2.6, but with the numbers you gave returned a pressure ratio of about 3.2, or 32psi. Too much for a K14. The annoying thing is that the flow (~.15m^3/s) is just about right.

gotcha! thanks for pointing that out. Stupid me wasnt actually looking at the PR numbers, just the graph..

Reply #69May 05, 2011, 11:20:01 pm

vanagonturbo

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 639
    • Fine Tuning
Re: Garrett GT2056 turbo
« Reply #69 on: May 05, 2011, 11:20:01 pm »
Alcaid, do you have an opinion on the 2052-3?

20lb/min of air is too wimpy ;)

Agreed! ;) Is this the part where we come to the conclusion that the efficiency of the motor does not allow for 35+psi on one turbo without going into surge, getting out of the efficiency range of the turbo, or going over the choke line?

One would think it would be possible... but its not looking so optimistic at this point.

Reply #70May 05, 2011, 11:35:11 pm

RabbitJockey

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 5064
  • Personal Text
    America, DUCK YEAH!!!
Re: Garrett GT2056 turbo
« Reply #70 on: May 05, 2011, 11:35:11 pm »
i've read over this a few times its 6 years old, passenger performance went on to build the 190whp car that surged like a ***, but they basically conclude the same things, these engines are too small, to flow alot of air that way, have too small and not enough valves to flow alot of air that way, and don't rev high enough to flow a lot of air that way, we're stuck in a little box.  its almost like u need an aaz and to rev the *** out of it in order to make any real power.  or just compound turbos...
01 Jetta TDI 100% stock daily
81 Rabbit:TDI-M ported head, Frank06 cam, PD intake, hybrid T3 turbo, Renault intercooler, Syl20 11mm pump, light weight fw, and yellow California Clutch clutch kit

Reply #71May 05, 2011, 11:55:49 pm

vanagonturbo

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 639
    • Fine Tuning
Re: Garrett GT2056 turbo
« Reply #71 on: May 05, 2011, 11:55:49 pm »
:( Ok, well I guess for now, I will put an MBC on the 2056 and work on a compound setup.. I have not really been capable of WOT pulls as the 2056 spools pretty quickly and I have to let off the throttle when I see it nearing 20psi. I have read that thread many times. One thing that I keep finding in this forum are threads that start off with fantastic builds and big numbers, but one click to the last page always results in engine failure of one sort or another...

Reply #72May 06, 2011, 12:16:08 am

Powered by Spearco

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 1203
Re: Garrett GT2056 turbo
« Reply #72 on: May 06, 2011, 12:16:08 am »
Hey, I've got no failures yet or to speak of.  :-\. That might change at the dyno on Saturday though.
'87 Syncro Transporter Single Cab "Now TDI"
'78 Rabbit..Gas Weekend Racer
'81 Caddy..Diesel 1.6/1.9 TD hybrid 275HP 349TQ "Retired"
'90 MultiVan, 2.5 Suby Swap, Porsche Brakes
'76 Scirocco TD dragster project
'13 Golf R:. Tuned
'98 Puch G320

Reply #73May 06, 2011, 12:39:18 am

vanagonturbo

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 639
    • Fine Tuning
Re: Garrett GT2056 turbo
« Reply #73 on: May 06, 2011, 12:39:18 am »
I've been watching your thread. ;) fingers crossed for no bad things ;) you are using N20 though, so....

Reply #74May 06, 2011, 12:51:13 am

Powered by Spearco

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 1203
Re: Garrett GT2056 turbo
« Reply #74 on: May 06, 2011, 12:51:13 am »
Well, once at the dyno. Hopefully, if they have time, being that there is over twenty trucks participating, they will let me run the first with just the pump to get a baseline pull, then use the N02 with an .024 jet and the third pull let me change it out for the .042 jet.

'87 Syncro Transporter Single Cab "Now TDI"
'78 Rabbit..Gas Weekend Racer
'81 Caddy..Diesel 1.6/1.9 TD hybrid 275HP 349TQ "Retired"
'90 MultiVan, 2.5 Suby Swap, Porsche Brakes
'76 Scirocco TD dragster project
'13 Golf R:. Tuned
'98 Puch G320

 

Fixmyvw.com