-
#15 by gldgti on 24 Feb, 2010 23:19
-
I am thinking of adding a rifling type design into the cups that I make to add turbulence the spray pattern is somewhat of a flattened cone shape which will push the atomized fuel downwards against the sides of the chamber which will have a rifling to it to give the entire process a sort of twist moving downwards and back inwards, natural compression occurs in a vortex, so the hope in this design is an increase in performance from passive movement into a more effecient turbulent design. I know it is hard to visualize, but maybe someone with cad can help me here?
I cant quite visualise what your talking about here, but its interesting nonetheless :-) Remember that the fuel is ignited as it is sprayed from the injector when the engine is running, so you must think of it not as a stream of particles like a fuel mist from a carburettor or petrol injector, but as a jet of plasma (literally, i suppose). and for that matter, it is very short! -
#16 by rabbitman on 25 Feb, 2010 00:09
-
Not trying to be too critical but I think your wasting time with this one (now you'll really want to do it
).
I think making the inside of the swirl-chamber smoother would be much better than adding more surface area, which would soak up more heat and that's not at all what you want.
Here is a pic showing the side view of the injector, GP, swirl chamber and piston, note the outlet of the swirl chamber isn't in the center so the air will swirl a lot as it's shoved in and out of the hole:
I've heard of notching the piston below the swirl chamber outlet, IIRC, to modify the power curve.
Since it seems to me like really high power vw IDI's like to spit the chambers out I wonder if a slightly larger hole would put less strain on 'em?
It would make a more clattery diesel sound which I doubt you'd mind 
.
Also part of the little hole's duty is to help speed the ingoing air up to create turbulance/swirl and also to quiet the exploding fuel. -
#17 by NintendoKD on 25 Feb, 2010 06:31
-
Ricardo, huh? I'll have to call them and ask some questions. The 70's right, there is prolly still someone around that knows about this stuff, an old-timer, if you will.
-
#18 by smutts on 25 Feb, 2010 11:45
-
Quote
and both VW and merc got it from Recardo (we're talking 70's)
er... 1930's is more like it, this is OLD technology,
http://www-g.eng.cam.ac.uk/125/achievements/ricardo/ -
#19 by Mark(The Miser)UK on 25 Feb, 2010 15:56
-
i'm sure we've been here before, but i'll re-iterate succinctly a the history -
this swirl chamber thingy is really not a bodged up VW bit of crap - its got a hell of a lot of research behind it and for along time before VW picked it up - mercedes were using it just beforehand aswell, and both VW and merc got it from Recardo (we're talking 70's). Now, Recardo were and still are the world (no bull) leaders in combustion modelling and research.
The swirl chamber operation is actually quite efficient and elegant, and really the only disadvantage we see is from the heat lost through the extra surface area. Apart from this it all works mavallously well.
A couple of points -
1) we dont really need to aid flow into the swirl chamber - the idea is only to have a small amount of air in there anyway, since if you have more combustion in the prechamber, you will lose more heat through its walls and ultimately have a decrease in efficiency.
2) when combustion front is expanding out of the swirl chamber, the piston is basically at TDC. Its very important that the flow out of the chamber is directed properly. Ideally, we want and unbiassed flow (coming straight out of the hole in the precup) so that the pressure is initially evenly distributed across the piston crown. this is why:
>the injector is located centrally in the swirl chamber;
>the swirl chamber outlet port is simmetrical and central to the piston;
> the depressions in the pistion crown are symmetrical.
opening up the outlet of the prechamber will cause the combustion front to decellerate more gradually - this is bad for turbulence in the "true combustion chamber" which ofcourse is the cylinder itself.
Well you're on the right lines but with a few errors:
Design date not from the 1970's but to the 1920's [just spotted someone else has mentioned this.]
The swirl chamber /entrance is not placed centrally [valves in the way] see photo:
http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/1562/fifthabradepo0.jpg'
Note Bosch moved from valve design, into diesel pumps, but was not an engine expert. The engine expert was Harry:
Harry Ricardo was the developer, but even he was predated by an earlier designer [I can look it up], however he took it to the present form through the 'Comet' engines/cylinder heads. The first engine prototype had injectors injecting radially, like Merc did I believe. Swirl speed is controlled by apperture size
However, we [VW] follow his MkV design where the injector injects along a cord of the spherical chamber. There is a book that goes into great detail.
The book if you can find it, is called High Speed Internal combustion engines. [Great detail on Early tank engines]Reprinted about 4 times. ABE has a couple for around $400...edit: I see some reprints from $107. A very good read. My copy is the second edition. Presented by British Aerospace to their top design engineer
He had the best engineers design a series of adjustable engines, ie variable compression.
He tested many engines for aircraft, and tanks, and then moved onto these high speed diesel engines.
He found that the optimal swirl speed, was about 10 x crank rotation.
He also proved that over atomisation through higher and higher injector pressures was unneccessary, and indeed counter productive. This was because the very fine atomisation, although burns 'well', has little energy and cannot cross the path of the air, and so leads to poor mixing.
He found that larger droplets traversed the chamber better, and that the passing hot air actually rasps the surface of the droplets, ignites and quickly vapourises.
Apart from the initial fixed time period at the start of combustion, he found that rate of combustion in the swirlchamber was directly proportional to the crank speed/swirl speed, within reasonable engine speeds.
[Some time ago I quoted from a VAG diesel service manual, where they summized that general spray condition of injector had little bearing on performance, I assume barring a solid jet, this tally's with Harry's findings.]
As pointed out Harry's company has lasted into modern times.
-
#20 by smokin_fun on 25 Feb, 2010 16:32
-
#21 by NintendoKD on 25 Feb, 2010 18:45
-
fascinating stuff