Author Topic: A good read. (vw's TDIs) (Read 5329 times)

Smokey Eddy · « **on:** February 07, 2009, 06:49:31 pm »

I found this page a good read. Maybe you guys will too?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Volkswagen_AG_diesel_engines

drrtybyl · « **Reply #1 on:** February 07, 2009, 08:38:57 pm »

10cyl 350hp TDI-powered Phaeton, anyone? Seems like quite a gaffe to release that car to support the VW brand rather than Audi, based on the price point.

Quote

This inline three cylinder Turbocharged Direct Injection (TDI) diesel engine is the powerplant of the Volkswagen Lupo 3L and Audi A2 3L, with a low consumption of only three litres per hundred kilometers (94 mpg/78 US mpg).

It's really funny how little credit conventional diesel engines get for being efficient here in the US. I'd rather spew diesel exhaust into the air than dump Lion hybrid batteries into rivers at 1/10th the cost any day.

jtanguay · « **Reply #2 on:** February 07, 2009, 09:00:55 pm »

Quote from: "drrtybyl"

10cyl 350hp TDI-powered Phaeton, anyone? Seems like quite a gaffe to release that car to support the VW brand rather than Audi, based on the price point.

Quote
This inline three cylinder Turbocharged Direct Injection (TDI) diesel engine is the powerplant of the Volkswagen Lupo 3L and Audi A2 3L, with a low consumption of only three litres per hundred kilometers (94 mpg/78 US mpg).

It's really funny how little credit conventional diesel engines get for being efficient here in the US. I'd rather spew diesel exhaust into the air than dump Lion hybrid batteries into rivers at 1/10th the cost any day.

yea its amazing how people can be 'brainwashed'. just look at beta vs VHS. even though beta was the better platform, VHS won by having the better marketing.

what i love better, is the fuel cell powered car. it's being hyped up so much, but it is such a truly horrible way of powering a vehicle. it still requires hydrogen AND oxygen being stored in the car (safer than gasoline? HELL NO!) and still, if you were to burn both of those 'fuels' in the otto cycle engine, it would be more efficient than converting them to electricity using the fuel cell, and powering an electric motor from that.

i really think that Americans should try to get a hold of Obama and get him to allow the importation of these vehicles into the US. then Canada will follow, because our government is run by morons, and will follow the US :lol:. THEN, the big three will start selling their diesel vehicles that they already sell abroad over here. WOW!

drrtybyl · « **Reply #3 on:** February 07, 2009, 09:17:02 pm »

Some ironic reporting that supports your statement:
The 65 mpg Ford the U.S. Can't Have

"Wha?! 350 mil to build an engine factory in Mexico? We can't afford that!"

Smokey Eddy · « **Reply #4 on:** February 07, 2009, 11:00:03 pm »

that three cyl tdi gets less than 4l/100km ... :shock:
apparently diesels are environmentally-un-friendly. Is it because they burn 1/4 the fuel?

My friend's parents have a Lincoln Navigator that he hypes up all the time and wants to buy off them. I just don't get it :roll: 13.1 average mpg is what it's ecu reckons. That's pretty dismal by any standard. He argued that it was better than my jetta because you can carry and extra three people - but he also added that the mileage goes down significantly when you add people into it...

be able to use a hoola-hoop in the back seat vs. driving 400% further... tough decision

I wouldn't be so baffled and confused if my friend was 50 not 20!

commuter boy · « **Reply #5 on:** February 08, 2009, 01:37:46 pm »

I would have been happier having the backseat room when I was a teenager, I can tell you that!

Smokey Eddy · « **Reply #6 on:** February 08, 2009, 06:34:54 pm »

BAhahahahha!!!!

We can talk more of this when i come see you in a week or two

(i hope that offer is still available?

I'm having a crappy time getting my exhaust together)