Author Topic: 1.6L Timing advance curve mod...  (Read 23333 times)

Reply #15April 22, 2007, 12:36:58 pm

burn_your_money

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8999
  • Personal Text
    Bright, On
1.6L Timing advance curve mod...
« Reply #15 on: April 22, 2007, 12:36:58 pm »
Does anyone else think that there may be merit to his statement regarding the timing and emmisions?
Tyler

Reply #16April 22, 2007, 12:41:06 pm

jtanguay

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 6879
1.6L Timing advance curve mod...
« Reply #16 on: April 22, 2007, 12:41:06 pm »
Quote from: "burn_your_money"
Does anyone else think that there may be merit to his statement regarding the timing and emmisions?


by advancing the timing curve???


This is how we deal with porn spammers! You've been warned.

Reply #17April 22, 2007, 12:42:35 pm

Vincent Waldon

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3255
    • My collection of HOWTOs
1.6L Timing advance curve mod...
« Reply #17 on: April 22, 2007, 12:42:35 pm »
Absolutely it is true that manufacturers have  for a long time had to balance power and drivability with emission legislation.  

A long time ago when I was a Beetle guy we clearly saw changes in carb jetting and distributor timing directly related to the legislative environment a particular model of Beetle was sold.... California was a great example of special jetting and a distributor with a *special* advance curve.

Diesel emissions of course don't follow the same math, but I can certainly believe that manufacturer still has to do tradeoffs based on emission standards.


Vince
Vince

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
2001 silver TDI Jetta Malone Stage 1.5 , 2001 blue TDI Jetta SBIII 216s Malone Stage 3, 1970 Bay Window bus

Gone but not forgotten: 1969/1971 Beetles, 1969/1974 Westies, 1979 Rabbit, 1986 TD Jetta, 1992 gas Jetta, 1994 TD Jetta

Reply #18April 22, 2007, 12:44:36 pm

burn_your_money

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8999
  • Personal Text
    Bright, On
1.6L Timing advance curve mod...
« Reply #18 on: April 22, 2007, 12:44:36 pm »
so then the yellow (or green, I forget) spring mod will probably net some nice clean power
Tyler

Reply #19March 13, 2008, 12:25:18 pm

rabbitman

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 2788
1.6L Timing advance curve mod...
« Reply #19 on: March 13, 2008, 12:25:18 pm »
Andrew, your right on the money. I checked my pump pressure and it was 10psi low. A punch and hammer work fine.....'till you get sick of tapping forever and hit just a little harder, I took mine apart like three times :roll:
After I got the pressure right it sounded like it was pinging to much so I followed hagars advice and retarded the timing as much as I could w/o it shaking. Also rigged a fuel jug up on the passenger floor so I can watch the fuel get drank, kinda depressing, so far barely 10 miles on a quart of diesel. I think I voided my pumps warranty but thats OK, they stink anyways.
'82 Rabbit, I put on a euro vnt-15, 2.25" DP, 2.5" exhaust, the result.....it whistled.

I removed the turbo, made a toilet bowl 2.5" DP, the result....it was deafening. Now it has a homemade muffler up front and a thrush in the rear, the result.....less loud.
Watch: AGENDA, GRINDING AMERICA DOWN

Reply #20March 13, 2008, 10:26:17 pm

Vincent Waldon

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3255
    • My collection of HOWTOs
1.6L Timing advance curve mod...
« Reply #20 on: March 13, 2008, 10:26:17 pm »
Hi Mark... not sure what you mean by "exhauster" ?

I know that petrol = gas, boot = trunk, and steak and kidney pie = food poisoning, but that's about it for my knowledge of British ?!! :wink:

If you mean the vacuum pump then the answer is yup.. that's where the OEM ones are driven from actually.
Vince

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
2001 silver TDI Jetta Malone Stage 1.5 , 2001 blue TDI Jetta SBIII 216s Malone Stage 3, 1970 Bay Window bus

Gone but not forgotten: 1969/1971 Beetles, 1969/1974 Westies, 1979 Rabbit, 1986 TD Jetta, 1992 gas Jetta, 1994 TD Jetta

Reply #21March 14, 2008, 05:16:13 am

gldgti

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 488
    • http://scramjetsite.8m.com
1.6L Timing advance curve mod...
« Reply #21 on: March 14, 2008, 05:16:13 am »
Quote from: "jimfoo"
Now, I know little about the pumps, but could the dynamic timing setting from the factory also be emissions influenced rather than performance  driven, hence there being some merit to what he said?  


good point. in my reading of numerous diesel design papers for uni i did come across many correllations between timing advance and NOx emissions.

the VW IDI is ...notorious maybe?.... for being a producer of NOx, a powerful smog creating gas.

the 1.6TD design paper even goes as far to state that in california the vw idi was given waiver from reaching emissions requirements for NOx merely because it was so good in all other areas!

i know for a fact that NOx emissions are hard to get around with IDI diesels whilst still achieving optimal timing setting for bsfc (brake specific fuel consumption).
'77 Golf LS 4 door twincharger project
'91 Golf Cabrio 1.9TD
'94 Golf TD - AAZ, 2.5" Mandrel DP and exhaust, Merc T3 1.6TD boost pin, FMIC, Koni suspension, VR6 Brakes, VR6 Seats, VR6 sway-bars - sadly missed
'07 SKODA Octavia 1.9 TDI PD - Remapped ECU

Reply #22March 16, 2008, 10:23:54 pm

lyeinyoureye

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 96
1.6L Timing advance curve mod...
« Reply #22 on: March 16, 2008, 10:23:54 pm »
Quote from: "gldgti"
i know for a fact that NOx emissions are hard to get around with IDI diesels whilst still achieving optimal timing setting for bsfc (brake specific fuel consumption).
True, but the trade offs are definitely not proportional. A ~5% reduction in fuel efficiency is worthwhile to see a half or third of the NOx emissions IMO.

Reply #23March 20, 2008, 05:14:46 am

Tintin

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 1279
1.6L Timing advance curve mod...
« Reply #23 on: March 20, 2008, 05:14:46 am »
Quote from: "prothe"
I'm going to have to think about this, because I'm having a hard time grasping this.  

The feed pump is a simple rotary pump.  It is always spinning.  At low RPM's the pressure regulator isn't doing anything.  All the pressure goes straight to the pump.  Then when the RPM (and internal pressure) of the feed pump is high enough, the pressure regulator's spring is compressed enough to limit the pressure to that specific point.  Above that point the extra diesel is fed back into the intake, instead of the pump.  

Where is my logic wrong?


Yes, in part,  the regulator is effective at idle + ou -, if it's not properly adjusted, you need to back the initial timing.

Several Bosch VE pump have an electric cold start (advance timing) directly on the regulator.

With an open regulator (for test) the motor can not rev higher than 1200-1300RPM.

On another note, there are a lot of different regulator, you can make a different timing curve:

From idle at 40psi to 4000rpm at 75psi ..........
From idle at 40 psi to 4000rpm at 125 psi.........

There are a lot of combination you can make,  a low timing at low rpm is a good help to spool a big turbo,  etc...........

Reply #24March 20, 2008, 07:28:55 pm

CoolAirVw

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 175
1.6L Timing advance curve mod...
« Reply #24 on: March 20, 2008, 07:28:55 pm »
I cant get my way so I'm gonna delete my posts!
85 Jetta Turbo Diesel
75 Porsche 914
93 GMC Truck
99 Caravan <--wifes gotta drive something :)

Reply #25March 21, 2008, 05:48:10 pm

Giles@PerformanceDiesel

  • Authorized Vendor
  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 221
    • http://www.performancediesel.ca
Giving you my two cents
« Reply #25 on: March 21, 2008, 05:48:10 pm »
Hey  guys
being a fully trained Bosch trained tech i can give your conlusive
results on your debates

yes the pressure regualtor, regulates all the time even during cranking
and from all speeds there after.

the vane type pump is always trying to overcome the spring tension on the regulator and when you change the top plug by hitting it with the
punch you are changing the spring tension therefore changing the
pump pressure.

Giles

Reply #26March 21, 2008, 06:49:10 pm

Tuppence

  • Newbie

  • Offline
  • *

  • 4
1.6L Timing advance curve mod...
« Reply #26 on: March 21, 2008, 06:49:10 pm »
I'm a relatively new to the world of diesels, but I have attached a pressure gauge and photo tach to several pumps on the bench, and I can confirm what Giles just said about the regulator performing its function at all rpm.  At low/idle rpm the pressure may not be sufficient to advance the timing, but it is sufficient to make fuel flow through the orifice in the out bolt.  

Tapping the plug down with a punch results in an increase in pressure all along the rpm range, not just the 'high' pressure.

There has been mention of 'weak' vane pumps.  I'm not sure what was meant, but my experience is that if the vanes are clean and move smoothly in the impeller, they will easily develop 150 psi and good outflow.  The first pump I disassembled was rusted tight; I knew I couldn't make it any worse, so I took it apart, hammered the vanes out of the impeller with a punch, sanded the rust off with 400 grit, re-assembled, and later tested it.  Even that vane pump produced essentially the same pressure as other pumps when the same regulator was swapped into it.

What I would like to see from some of you who have dynamic diesel timing devices, (or from any source if it's available,) is a useful way to relate pressure to degrees of advance: maybe a table or graph showing the typical advance-to-pressure curve.

Reply #27March 21, 2008, 09:16:22 pm

jimfoo

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 2110
    • http://www.66rover.com
1.6L Timing advance curve mod...
« Reply #27 on: March 21, 2008, 09:16:22 pm »
Quote from: "Tuppence"

What I would like to see from some of you who have dynamic diesel timing devices, (or from any source if it's available,) is a useful way to relate pressure to degrees of advance: maybe a table or graph showing the typical advance-to-pressure curve.

Well, there are supposed to be at least 5 different advance springs, and on top of that, all the shims. So there is not going to be just one curve.
Jim
1966 Land-Rover 88" with 1.9 1Z which has been transformed to an M-TDI
TFO35 mechanically controlled VNT, IC , and 2.5" exhaust.
Driven daily

Reply #28March 22, 2008, 06:47:02 am

Tuppence

  • Newbie

  • Offline
  • *

  • 4
1.6L Timing advance curve mod...
« Reply #28 on: March 22, 2008, 06:47:02 am »
"five springs, shims: not just one curve"

Yeah, I knew it wouldn't be that simple; never is.  Guess I'll just have to get my own dynamic timing device; someday they'll be more affordable.  Until then I'll just have to play with the pressure issue.  Bugs me just a bit, though, that it's a process that only controls timing indirectly: if the timing advance mechanism sitting in the bottom of the pump gets some piece of crud or gunk and doesn't move properly I wouldn't even know it except if it got bad enough to impact performance/mileage to a noticeable degree, which would probably have to be more than 10%.[/quote]

Reply #29March 22, 2008, 12:51:49 pm

Tintin

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 1279
1.6L Timing advance curve mod...
« Reply #29 on: March 22, 2008, 12:51:49 pm »
For those which ever seen, here a feed pump:



What I wants to say about different timing curve, look at this pic, there is different spring hardness:

**From idle at 40psi to 4000rpm at 75psi ..........
    or from idle at 40 psi to 4000rpm at 125 psi.......**



The bleed hole are also different size:



Out-Bolt are also in different size, more or less flow trough the pump and that affect the pressure, and there exist an adjustable out-Bolt:



For people more experimented, it is easy to do anything on the timing curve.