GUESS I WILL ANSWER MY OWN QUESTION HERE FROM RESEARCH OUTSIDE THIS PAGE... THE N/A HAS DIFFERENT
1.HEAD- DIFFERENT ALLOY AND SEATS THAN TURBO
2. VALVES- NOT AS HEAVY DUTY AS TURBO
3. BLOCK- NO OIL SQUIRTERS FOR BOTTOM PISTON COOLING
4. PISTONS-NO KNOTCH FOR OIL COOLING
5. PUMP
IN SHORT... MANY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE N/A
AND THE TURBO 1.6... NOT THE LEAST OF WHICH BEING METALURGICAL
CONVERSATIONS WITH SEVERAL DIFFERENT INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE PUT TURBOS ON THE N/A SUGGEST IT IS ILL ADVISED.... I DO NOT KNOW THE LEVELS OF BOOST BEING ATTEMPTED IN THE CONVERSION..
.... I DO NOT KNOW IF THE ATTEMPTS WERE WITH INTERCOOLING...
I DO KNOW HOW LONG IT TAKES TO GAULL A PISTON ON A CATERPILLAR 3406 TAKING IT AS EASY AS POSSIBLE WHEN YOU ARE LOOKING FOR A PLACE TO PULL OVER BECAUSE YOUR WATER PUMP HAS GIVEN UP..... LESS THAN 5 MINUTES AT EXTREMELY MODERATE SPEED..30MPH
YES, I HAVE SOME PISTON MELTING EXPERIENCE UNDER MY BELT...
MY FEELING AT THIS POINT IS THAT IT POWER LEVELS OF 100HP PLUS WOULD BE PULLING THE GRENADE PIN...
THE MOTOR MIGHT BE OK IF
1. INTERCOOLED
2. HEAT BARRIER COATED... VALVES, CHAMBER, PISTON SKIRTS
DOMES....
3. RUN AT MODERATE BOOST LEVELS.... PERHAPS ONLY TO STOCK
TURBO 1.6 LEVELS...
MAX POWER AT ABOUT 90HP...MAYBE LESS....
COULD OR SHOULD IT BE DONE?

?
SHAME TO SEE ALL THE N/A'S COLLECTING DUST BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT AS TOUGH.....
IF IT COULD BE DONE AFFORDABLY AND WITHOUT A TON OF EXTRA TIME INVOLVED IN THE BUILD THEN THE ANSWER MIGHT STILL BE YES..