To copy-reply from my build thread, the machinist looks to have boogered up my re-bore. I used a digital dial bore gauge calibrated to 80.01mm to check bore taper and out-of-round. Here are my readings. Note all measurements are plus the above measurement baseline, and (H)horizontal is correspondent to viewing the block deck, with the front of the engine as 'bottom':
H V
C1
T 0.026mm 0.028mm
M 0.014mm 0.022mm
B 0.030mm 0.026mm
C2
T 0.034mm 0.032mm
M 0.016mm 0.032mm
B 0.032mm 0.030mm
C3
T 0.032mm 0.034mm
M 0.020mm 0.038mm
B 0.036mm 0.036mm
C4
T 0.028mm 0.026mm
M 0.020mm 0.024mm
B 0.036mm 0.032mm
After running some math on circumference of the cylinders (in inches on that), I determined that these measurements would increase any new ring gap (0.007"-0.015") by 0.001727"-0.004676", which I'll round/simplify to 0.002"-0.005"
So as it seems that would be the reason behind my recently-measured excessive ring end gap, which measures anywhere from 0.024" to 0.031".
Now I'll have to get the block bore out ANOTHER 0.5mm, to 80.51mm, but not by the same machinist. Really pissed right now. Why the hell can't anything NOT cost me more money? :evil:
NOTE: I'll admit I took these measurements with the main caps not torqued, but the top and bottom measurements I think speak for themselves.
Lastly, at least the piston skirts measure in correctly at 79.98mm exactly. Too bad it looks like I'll need another set.
