F.S. 2.0 Turbo Diesel - S O L D !!!! - Parts for Sale/Wanted - VWDiesel.net The IDI, TDI, and mTDI source.

• F.S. 2.0 Turbo Diesel - S O L D !!!! by ein bora on 20 Oct, 2011 05:47
• Thanks for the interest - she's sold
  I bought this a couple of years ago for a project and it's still sitting here. Need it gone - Audi 2.0 Turbo Diesel engine in a 1983 Audi 5000 TD.  10mm pump, K26 turbo,  auto transmission.  The seller stated no overheating problems.
  Starter is dead and the car is basically scrap with maybe a few salvageable parts other than the drive train. She does roll and can be loaded onto trailer with which I can help.
  Not sure what it's worth - so if interested please contact me with an offer and I'm sure we can work something out.
  I'm in the Thousand Island area, between Brockville and Kingston Ontario.
  
  Please contact me here by pm or email me at -  [email protected]
  
  Thanks for looking.
  
  
  
• #1 by R.O.R-2.0 on 20 Oct, 2011 12:33
• do you have pics of the K26 swapped on it?
  
  or, if its a stock turbo, its a K24, same specs as a 1.6TD turbo.. other than the way the wastegate is mounted, and the flanges on the hotside are audi specific..
• #2 by rabbid79 on 23 Oct, 2011 19:22
• If you decide to part out the engine, there are a few items I'd be interested in.
• #3 by Dirtrag2 on 25 Oct, 2011 13:35
• what year is it?
• #4 by trav1856 on 26 Oct, 2011 09:18
• Quote from: Blocksmith on 25 Oct, 2011 16:43

  Ummm, he clearly stated in the opening post that it's an '83.....
  

  
  We all know that reading is a lost art, but there's no need to be a jackass about it. That's not how we roll here.
• #5 by Blocksmith on 26 Oct, 2011 16:19
• Didn't mean for it to come across quite that way, but looking back at it, there's really no way it could've be received as anything other than an @$$hole moment, so, point taken and post deleted. No hard feelings, dirtrag?
• #6 by Dirtrag2 on 27 Oct, 2011 15:44
• i normaly don't get offended by stuff online, i'm pretty easygoing...
  however, in my defense, i think the year was edited in afterwards, but still my bad for not re-reading the post
  
  cheers all
• #7 by ein bora on 29 Oct, 2011 06:46
• Quote from: Dirtrag2 on 27 Oct, 2011 15:44

  i normaly don't get offended by stuff online, i'm pretty easygoing...
  however, in my defense, i think the year was edited in afterwards, but still my bad for not re-reading the post
  
  cheers all
  

  
  Not that it matters and I don't mean to be stickler - but the year was not edited in afterwards.
• #8 by R.O.R-2.0 on 29 Oct, 2011 08:49
• Quote from: ein bora on 29 Oct, 2011 06:46

  Quote from: Dirtrag2 on 27 Oct, 2011 15:44

  i normaly don't get offended by stuff online, i'm pretty easygoing...
  however, in my defense, i think the year was edited in afterwards, but still my bad for not re-reading the post
  
  cheers all
  

  
  Not that it matters and I don't mean to be stickler - but the year was not edited in afterwards.
  

  
  x2...
  
  i was the FIRST to read the ad.. year was present the whole time.. not that it matters. TDs were only 82, or 83 anyways.. so theres a 50/50 shot..