and I don't suspect the 2.4 would be any different, given that they are pretty much 1.6 with an additional cylinder ??
Quote from: "Vincent Waldon"and I don't suspect the 2.4 would be any different, given that they are pretty much 1.6 with an additional cylinder ??what 5 cyl is 2.4?1.6/4=.4 .4x5=2.0 .4x6=2.4wait i think i might be stupid1.9/4=.475 .475x5=2.375
Quote from: "gambit420s"Quote from: "Vincent Waldon"and I don't suspect the 2.4 would be any different, given that they are pretty much 1.6 with an additional cylinder ??what 5 cyl is 2.4?1.6/4=.4 .4x5=2.0 .4x6=2.4wait i think i might be stupid1.9/4=.475 .475x5=2.375i cant even do math right today