...BTW your Bieber avatar is awesome.-Malone
I have a lot of experience with VNT15s (and 17s) and almost all of the stock 1.6 and 1.9 turbos on several 1.6 and 1.9 engines. The variable geometry makes the VNT with vanes closed spool faster than the K03 and with vanes open flow considerably better at the high-end than the K24 or T3. I'm not sure what your issue is with your ALH, Lucas. It may be the considerably higher weight of the A4s or there could be an actual engine management issue. A friend's AHU runs like a total turd (worse performance than a 1.6 non-turbo Rabbit) and doesn't toss a code...
So you're saying the VNT-15 won't push 18 PSI any higher than 3000 RPM. Because that's about the max of it's efficiency range.I think it will push 18 with the vanes half way open at 3000RPM. I know it will with a 1.6.
I will check all that when I do the timing belt here soon. From what I can see nothing is bad.Still, if you make all your power down low and it even stays there, it feels like you lose pull. I don't think 8v and others need the 2:1 ring gear and .5 overdrive that they think they do. I think they need more turbo.
My alh isn't the best runner, no codes, but without the tune it was basically just about the same as CRSMP5's mk1 jetta when following him. It is an N/A mk1 jetta at that. I think it was the best running one I have ever seen but still. Now with the stage 2 tune it doesn't do bad, but it makes that distinct line at 3,000 rpm more noticeable.