-
GM marine nozzles??
by
vwjunkie53
on 19 May, 2011 13:49
-
Anyone run these? I know building the pump with a bigger head is going to make the largest improvement, however I'm still working on doing the 12mm pump for my D24T. Right now the stock 10mm head pump is maxed out and I'm running 273 nozzles. With my current turbo/intercooler setup I'm cleaning up all the fuel at 25lbs of boost. The nozzles are advertised as 40hp upgrade for the GM, so I'm hoping I could see a power increase.. Throwing in a set of nozzles is quick and easy compaired to doing a pump, and with a new baby around my free time is limited.
Thanks,
Jason
-
#1
by
R.O.R-2.0
on 19 May, 2011 13:58
-
owen ran a set of 6.2 or 6.5 nozzles in his VW.. i dont think they were a power increase..
VW nozzles already flow lots of fuel.. more than the engine can burn.
-
#2
by
745 turbogreasel
on 19 May, 2011 15:18
-
I wonder if those are the same as military nozzles? HMMW is supposed to be 165HP.
-
#3
by
truckinwagen
on 19 May, 2011 19:37
-
I am running(and have run in VW's in the past, like the G60 diesel) the GM 6.2 truck nozzles with good results.
no power increase on their own, but they will be able to out-flow the VW ones.
the reason that those are a power increase for a GM motor is that the nozzles were a bottleneck in fueling.
on a VW they are not by a long shot.
-Owen
-
#4
by
NintendoKD
on 22 May, 2011 20:06
-
candidate for more fuel= how much boost at how many rpms, this is a very important question for me
-
#5
by
R.O.R-2.0
on 22 May, 2011 21:06
-
candidate for more fuel= how much boost at how many rpms, this is a very important question for me
what are you talking about? what engine? what do you want to know? you dont put bigger injector nozzles in an idi VW its a waste of time. the nozzles are not the bottle neck.. they flow more fuel than the pump is capable of pumping..
-
#6
by
NintendoKD
on 22 May, 2011 21:40
-
that is all I am trying to find out ROR. not a stupid question considerin that I am pulling all of the stops in my build. The nozzles would flow more fuel than a regular person with a regular turbo at regular boost levels at regular rpms, with a regular pump would be able to pull off, I don't want a bottle neck, that is why the what for.
-
#7
by
nathan_b
on 22 May, 2011 23:24
-
ROR is right, I think there are multiple people here with 200+hp and stock nozzles
-
#8
by
nathan_b
on 22 May, 2011 23:24
-
sorry, double post.
-
#9
by
NintendoKD
on 23 May, 2011 03:23
-
cool, so no problem then, no need for aftermarket nozzles of any kind. EVER
-
#10
by
R.O.R-2.0
on 23 May, 2011 15:09
-
cool, so no problem then, no need for aftermarket nozzles of any kind. EVER
like i said, the injectors flow more fuel than the pump (even a giles pump) is capable of supplying.. all you need is a good, fresh set of nozzles and your good to go.
-
#11
by
burn_your_money
on 26 May, 2011 17:11
-
There is a lot more to an injector then just the amount of fuel it flows. When it flows how much, and if it has a pre-stream (forget the proper term) are just 2 variables. If flow was all that mattered there wouldn't be hundreds of different injector nozzles.
-
#12
by
NintendoKD
on 26 May, 2011 21:25
-
I get that, but due to the limited shape of the swirl chamber, and for all intents and purposes, the pattern is adequate . I do however, want to redesign a new type of swirl chamber that utilizes a vaccum design incorporated into it, basically it creates a turbine effect like a small vortex inside the combustion area and the swirl chamber, to better mix the air/fuel. for this a narrow cone shaped spray pattern would be necessary. this would also allow for a more even and thourough burn/flamefront, and be an altogether efficient design reducing emmissions as well. for the purpose of this forum, however, an different nozzle will not produce more power/efficiency, to the best of anyones knowledge.
-
#13
by
8v-of-fury
on 26 May, 2011 23:00
-
basically it creates a turbine effect like a small vortex inside the combustion area and the swirl chamber, to better mix the air/fuel. for this a narrow cone shaped spray pattern would be necessary. this would also allow for a more even and thourough burn/flamefront, and be an altogether efficient design reducing emmissions as well.
a.k.a TDI
-
#14
by
R.O.R-2.0
on 27 May, 2011 09:40
-
There is a lot more to an injector then just the amount of fuel it flows. When it flows how much, and if it has a pre-stream (forget the proper term) are just 2 variables. If flow was all that mattered there wouldn't be hundreds of different injector nozzles.
well, yea, we need to take into account if if it has the proper shape spray, and since were dealing with a 1.6, there is no need to worry about the pre-injection, because there is none..
thats why like 5 out of the hundreds of nozzles out there work with a VW..
GM prechamber should be shaped pretty similarly to the VW also.. and the 6.2/6.5 never had any sort of pre-injection that im aware of..