Author Topic: Theory on Timing  (Read 8392 times)

Reply #15December 19, 2005, 05:50:07 pm

Master ACiD

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 328
Theory on Timing
« Reply #15 on: December 19, 2005, 05:50:07 pm »
heres a question for you guys.
as the injection pump ages, do the inner working of the pump wear so the they retard over time?

for example, with a spark ignition engine using a dizzy, the shaft, roll pins, drive gear and such wear and over time the dizzy can get retarded a degree or 2.

so over the lifespan of an injection pump, would the inner parts of the pump wear slightly retard over time?

Reply #16December 19, 2005, 09:15:59 pm

dieselweasel

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 312
Re: Theory on Timing
« Reply #16 on: December 19, 2005, 09:15:59 pm »
Timing the injection pump with a dial indicator has absolutely nothing to do with pistons meeting valves.  The injection pump can be completely out of time and no interference will happen.  It won't run, but it won't hurt anything (other than wasting fuel).  

The cam to crank timing would be the culprit if there was an interference and that is timed with the bar it the slot of the cam.  Very good idea to doublecheck the cam timing.

[/quote]

I was just going to say that.  I think he had a little more than Eggnog.  

Of course that method would work, as long as the belt was put on tooth for tooth.  The cylinder head height change would be negligible unless the head was planed.  But as others have said, why not replace the belt?

And as for the previous question, yes injection timing will change over time due to pump wear.
'94 Jetta TD dusty mauve-302,xxx kms

Reply #17December 20, 2005, 02:07:57 am

NOTORIOUS VR

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 83
Re: Theory on Timing
« Reply #17 on: December 20, 2005, 02:07:57 am »
Quote from: "libbybapa"
Timing the injection pump with a dial indicator has absolutely nothing to do with pistons meeting valves.  The injection pump can be completely out of time and no interference will happen.  It won't run, but it won't hurt anything (other than wasting fuel).


I can vouch for that... I did my timing belt with absolutly no timing tools what so ever, and afterwards I adjusted the pump timing w/o a tool just to get the car running the best I could...

There is no way that interferance could be caused by pump timing itself... since you're not physically changing the cam/belt/sproket.

Reply #18December 20, 2005, 09:27:53 am

Northern RD

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 167
Theory on Timing
« Reply #18 on: December 20, 2005, 09:27:53 am »
Quote from: "libbybapa"
Quote from: "Northern RD"
Sloppy short-cuts of that sort generally tend to be more trouble than they`re worth as they seem to fail with depressing regularity: you then have to go back and do it again, an exercise in futility that could have easily been avoided if you`d taken the trouble to do the job right the first time,....
Also I`m curious: if yor rerk refers to others, then why quote me and send the remark my way?? avery roundabout  way of making a point,..


The first two paragraphs after the quote directly referred to your comments.  So your friend who trashed valves now uses a "dialo gauge" every time, eh.  Why not say, "He now uses synthetic lubricants"?  It would have as much bearing on your previous comment.  The only use for a "dialo gauge" with regard to timing a diesel is the injection pump, which has nothing to do with valves hitting pistons.  I don't need another dial indicator I already have both a metric and SAE versions.  I personally always recheck the pump timing when changing a belt, or head for that matter, but unless the pump has been unbolted 99.9% of the time, even with a new belt the timing will be exactly the same as it was, provided the belt is put on the sprockets correctly.  I recheck the timing just to make sure I'm not that 1 in 1,000 case.  But provided that the cam is indexed properly (very important) then perhaps someone would rather not spend the extra bucks for another tool (dial indicator) that probably won't be needed at this time.  That is not a shoddy shortcut, that is intelligent frugality, especially considering that not rechecking the fine timing of the pump will NOT cause any potential for engine damage unless the new belt is completely defective, in which case you're screwed anyway.  I cannot say what someone's financial situation or tool buying obsession is.  Sure, get that dial indicator along with the set of mics and the CNC lathe/mil/drilll, just in case.

My *Grand* point is that fine checking the pump timing is probably not necessary even when R+Ring the head.  Checking cam timing IS.  If the car doesn't run well or gets poor mileage after the work then getting the dial indicator might be worth it.  The *nature*(gist) of the whole thread is what is *necessary* for the procedure.  My vote is that fine pump timing isn't unless you unbolt the pump.  

Yes, the rest of the comments regarding retiming a pump were somewhat directed at other comments, but were related enough that I didn't bother to end my post and repost another one with the further comments. simpler post that way.   :wink:

Andrew


"Intelligent frugality"??
That`s a new one but unfortunatly it sounds like a rationalization for not spending a buck to get the right tool to do the job. The argument that the correct item for the application was generally priced beyond the resources of Joe Shmoe made sense 25-30 years ago(my own Snap-on kit cost $239 in `82 as I recall) but it really doesn`t wash anymore. With used gauge kits being had for as little as $40 on ebay(and recliberation of said used gauge damn near as cheap), pleading economic necessity in this instance no longer means that you`re a shrewd buyer, it just means that you`re cheap,....
As for the constant jabs you make at my typing skills, I fully confess to not being up to your high standards. The reason for this has to with the fact that I am forced to pound this out on using my left hand alone: I lost my right hand trying to disarm a Soviet era motar round that had been set up as a mine during my last(and, unfortunatly, final) tour of duty in Afganistan. Having a left hand only makes things rather cumbersom,.....
 :wink:  :wink:

Reply #19December 20, 2005, 07:01:04 pm

Master ACiD

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 328
Theory on Timing
« Reply #19 on: December 20, 2005, 07:01:04 pm »
if it is true that the injection pump retards the timing as it wears, then it really does make sence to re-check the pump timing with a dial indicator when r&r a belt and tensioner.

is everyone pretty much in agreement?

Reply #20December 20, 2005, 08:29:25 pm

vwmike

  • Authorized Vendor
  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 1158
Theory on Timing
« Reply #20 on: December 20, 2005, 08:29:25 pm »
The only thing that I think could happen with regards to wear affecting the timing is that the cam plate could end up worn, but I have yet to see an obviously worn cam plate.

Reply #21December 21, 2005, 10:10:46 am

Northern RD

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 167
Theory on Timing
« Reply #21 on: December 21, 2005, 10:10:46 am »
Quote from: "libbybapa"
I never made any jabs at your typing skills.  I put "dialo gauge" in quotes because I thought perhaps it was something I did not know about.  I asked twice what it was without response from you.  I assumed it was a dial indicator, and said so, but that was never confirmed or denied by you.

If the pump is not unbolted, how is it's timing changed in a way that having a dial indicator will correct it provided the timing belt is put back on correctly  :?:  :?:


Personally I don't care if anyone else uses or doesn't use a dial indicator, but when I see misinformation presented, I'll point it out as a service to others.  When others point out misinformation that I present I acknowlege it and thank them.

It would seem to me that you are more bent on emotional and dramatic comments than on any real mechanical explanation or discussion.  I originally made an accurate correction of your inaccurate implication that using a dial indicator will help prevent valve and piston contact.  Since then you've hassled me and IMO without any reason or explanation.

Andrew


Sooooo,
by maintaining the position that you`re better off in the long run using the right tool in an established procedure that`s accepted by the maufaturer to do a particular job, rather than using an admittantly hit-and-miss method that at its best might yield something close to the desired result, I am "promoting misinformation"?? If you say so, :?  :?  :?
Incidentally if you feel that I`ve slammed you and have hasseled you(beyond the seasonal remark regaurding eggnog), why not make a complaint to the moderator about my conduct? After all if your complaint is legitimate I`m sure that they wouldn`t hesitate to apply the appropriate sanctions against me: on the other hand if they look at the above posts and decide that that you`re simply frustrated be becouse some dared to call you to task for your stated opinion, I`m not sure how they`d react,.....
Happy Festivus all!! 8)

Reply #22December 21, 2005, 11:01:06 am

RedRotors

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 734
    • http://www.mikrotuning.com
Theory on Timing
« Reply #22 on: December 21, 2005, 11:01:06 am »
Please guys, keep it clean. Everyone has the right to express their opinions even if it goes againt others one. This forum has been kept w/o any catfights since the beginning and i want to keep it like this and not turn like a certain 'diesel tdi forum'.

Thanks everyone.

Marc/
Site Admin.
2k1 Golf TDI, 11mm pump, HFLOX Warp 5, VNT17, Wavetrac, 4" Lift
91' VW Golf Country
94' Dodge RAM 2500, 4x4, Cummins, 5 spds, 191's, 215hp injectors, SB Clutch
03' Dodge RAM 2500, 4x4, Cummins, 6 spds, MBPR 4 ", custom intake, Smarty Jr

-> www.mikrotuning.com <-
-> www.hflox.com <-