Author Topic: New Giles 1.6 NA pump. What next?  (Read 4231 times)

May 20, 2010, 05:32:51 am

overdrivegear

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 120
New Giles 1.6 NA pump. What next?
« on: May 20, 2010, 05:32:51 am »
I just installed my new Giles pump on my 1.6 NA cabriolet.  I timed it to 0.0405" (1.03 mm).  Is that too much advance for one of these super-duper Giles gizmos?  I wasn't sure if the magic he works on these things necessitates a different timing scheme.  The car ran ok but it did seem like there was a fair amount of ping due to the high advance, but maybe that was because the car wasn't up to operating temp.  So anyways, you Giles pump veterans feel free to give me some feedback. 
1985 Westy Golf 1.6 NA
1987 Cabriolet (soon to be 1.6 NA)

Reply #1May 20, 2010, 05:37:18 am

theman53

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 7835
  • Personal Text
    Holmes County Ohio - North Central Ohio
Re: New Giles 1.6 NA pump. What next?
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2010, 05:37:18 am »
I think Giles told me to start at either .85 or .95 and go from there. He builds alot of advance into the pump so they don't need the static timing IIRC.

Reply #2May 20, 2010, 06:48:01 am

Vincent Waldon

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3255
    • My collection of HOWTOs
Re: New Giles 1.6 NA pump. What next?
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2010, 06:48:01 am »
I think Giles told me to start at either .85 or .95 and go from there. He builds alot of advance into the pump so they don't need the static timing IIRC.

Yup...*lots* of dynamic advance.   ;D

 I think Giles would tell you 0.95 is the right static starting spot... but you can certainly confirm directly with him for your specific pump.
Vince

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
2001 silver TDI Jetta Malone Stage 1.5 , 2001 blue TDI Jetta SBIII 216s Malone Stage 3, 1970 Bay Window bus

Gone but not forgotten: 1969/1971 Beetles, 1969/1974 Westies, 1979 Rabbit, 1986 TD Jetta, 1992 gas Jetta, 1994 TD Jetta

Reply #3May 20, 2010, 11:44:15 am

overdrivegear

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 120
Re: New Giles 1.6 NA pump. What next?
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2010, 11:44:15 am »


I just called and he said that 0.95 should be the ceiling.  0.85-0.95mm is the range, so I'll put it in the middle of the road at 0.90mm
1985 Westy Golf 1.6 NA
1987 Cabriolet (soon to be 1.6 NA)

Reply #4May 20, 2010, 01:07:06 pm

jseeley

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 106
Re: New Giles 1.6 NA pump. What next?
« Reply #4 on: May 20, 2010, 01:07:06 pm »
Giles told me .95 for my 1.6NA which is also the factory spec for my 85 Golf (+ or - 0.02 according to the Bentley)

I'm at 0.97

What's next for me is a dual down-pipe and larger exhaust... I'm thinking 2.25. Suggestions? Muffler recommendations? Should I run a resonator? I don't want to be loud... But I'd like to get the most out of the little 1.6 as I can...
« Last Edit: May 20, 2010, 01:13:13 pm by jseeley »
85 Golf Diesel 1.6 NA 240K miles? (odometer broken)
87 Cabriolet 1.8 Gasser 104K miles
05 Golf 2.0 Gasser 66k miles
03 Jetta Wagon TDI 112k Miles

Reply #5May 20, 2010, 07:20:50 pm

RabbitJockey

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 5104
  • Personal Text
    America, DUCK YEAH!!!
Re: New Giles 1.6 NA pump. What next?
« Reply #5 on: May 20, 2010, 07:20:50 pm »
get a better intake, and if you run a bigger exhaust i highly recommend a resonator and muffler.  and i would say do go too big on the pipe.  i had a 2.25 tt exhaust on my na jetta and it was loud.  all my friends new when i was coming though cause it was such a unique sound haha until i did my turbo swap then it sounded much more peaceful.
01 Jetta TDI 100% stock daily
81 Rabbit:TDI-M ported head, Frank06 cam, PD intake, hybrid T3 turbo, Renault intercooler, Syl20 11mm pump, light weight fw, and yellow California Clutch clutch kit

Reply #6May 20, 2010, 07:25:37 pm

burn_your_money

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8999
  • Personal Text
    Bright, On
Re: New Giles 1.6 NA pump. What next?
« Reply #6 on: May 20, 2010, 07:25:37 pm »
I usually like them around 0.90. I find they are quite a bit quieter. I also rebuild my injectors to the bottom of the specs rather then the top.
Tyler

Reply #7May 20, 2010, 09:17:27 pm

jseeley

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 106
Re: New Giles 1.6 NA pump. What next?
« Reply #7 on: May 20, 2010, 09:17:27 pm »
get a better intake, and if you run a bigger exhaust i highly recommend a resonator and muffler.  and i would say do go too big on the pipe.  i had a 2.25 tt exhaust on my na jetta and it was loud.  all my friends new when i was coming though cause it was such a unique sound haha until i did my turbo swap then it sounded much more peaceful.

Is there much to gain removing the stock airbox? Seems like a fairly good design in the Mk2 going into the passenger wheel well-

(tubing is 2.25" from the wheel well to the filter box)

How about muffler choice? I hear a "turbo" muffler is good for an NA diesel as it won't cause any back pressure, but I'm sure the experts on here probably have some good advice... sounds like I will want to run resonator.... is there one in there stock? I didn't notice one. As it is now the engine is louder than the stock exhaust.
85 Golf Diesel 1.6 NA 240K miles? (odometer broken)
87 Cabriolet 1.8 Gasser 104K miles
05 Golf 2.0 Gasser 66k miles
03 Jetta Wagon TDI 112k Miles

Reply #8May 22, 2010, 06:27:08 pm

ToddA1

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 434
Re: New Giles 1.6 NA pump. What next?
« Reply #8 on: May 22, 2010, 06:27:08 pm »
get a better intake, and if you run a bigger exhaust i highly recommend a resonator and muffler.  and i would say do go too big on the pipe.  i had a 2.25 tt exhaust on my na jetta and it was loud.  all my friends new when i was coming though cause it was such a unique sound haha until i did my turbo swap then it sounded much more peaceful.

Was that a typo...  "do go too big on the pipe"?  Should that have been "don't"?

Were you running a resonator on the Jetta?

-Todd

Reply #9May 22, 2010, 07:25:00 pm

8v-of-fury

  • Guest
Re: New Giles 1.6 NA pump. What next?
« Reply #9 on: May 22, 2010, 07:25:00 pm »
its the quality of the pipe that makes or breaks it. A thin walled pipe will resonate A LOT of the sound out to its surroundings, being the tunnel under your car, and you'll hear more of the exhaust note. A thick walled pipe does a ton better at keeping the noise inside and out the back of the car where they belong.

I have a very good piece of information for anyone looking to upgrade an N/A exhaust. A new manifold is NOT I repeat not needed. If you take the down pipe off and take a look at this design, its genius, and perfect from the factory. The runners are all perfect size and perfect length for the engine they are on. Germans are smart remember. Also take a look at the opening of the exhaust Mani, its easily 2.25" if not 2.5". The down pipe and the exhaust are the restrictive parts of the system. The toilet bowl/flex joint is a very tried-tested-and-true design, cutting it out and going 2" or 2.25" from there back to a resonator and then to a good brand name "Free Flowing" muffler will produce, not only killer performance, a very good sound, for reasonably cheap and easy.

Reply #10May 25, 2010, 06:06:57 am

overdrivegear

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 120
Re: New Giles 1.6 NA pump. What next?
« Reply #10 on: May 25, 2010, 06:06:57 am »
Well, I got the pump timed to 0.90mm and it ran poorly.  Fair amount of emission, stutter at high rpm, and rough idle.  I had to pull the cold start advance just to get it to idle smoothly.  I think I'm going to move the timing up to 0.95mm and see how that is.  Question:  how much advance (in millimeters) does the cold start advance place from pushed all the way in to pulled all the way out.  I'm guessing is somewhere around 0.10 mm but that's just a guess.
1985 Westy Golf 1.6 NA
1987 Cabriolet (soon to be 1.6 NA)

Reply #11May 25, 2010, 02:00:37 pm

arb

  • Guest
Re: New Giles 1.6 NA pump. What next?
« Reply #11 on: May 25, 2010, 02:00:37 pm »
Well, I got the pump timed to 0.90mm and it ran poorly.  Fair amount of emission, stutter at high rpm, and rough idle.  I had to pull the cold start advance just to get it to idle smoothly.  I think I'm going to move the timing up to 0.95mm and see how that is.  Question:  how much advance (in millimeters) does the cold start advance place from pushed all the way in to pulled all the way out.  I'm guessing is somewhere around 0.10 mm but that's just a guess.

I set mine to 0.95mm and never use the cold start - even in Michigan winters.

Reply #12May 25, 2010, 07:55:46 pm

burn_your_money

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8999
  • Personal Text
    Bright, On
Re: New Giles 1.6 NA pump. What next?
« Reply #12 on: May 25, 2010, 07:55:46 pm »
The effect of the cold start advance has a lot to do with the specifics of the pump. Next time you are timing it give it a pull and see what happens. I seem to recall 0.25mm on mine. If you do pull the cold start out while timing, do a complete rotation of the pump in the direction of rotation. Failure to do this may result in the advance piston not returning to it's rest position which would give false timing values.
Tyler

Reply #13May 26, 2010, 07:20:04 am

subsonic

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 1836
Re: New Giles 1.6 NA pump. What next?
« Reply #13 on: May 26, 2010, 07:20:04 am »
I also rebuild my injectors to the bottom of the specs rather then the top.

pop pressure?
2009 Jetta TDI Loyal edition, 6-spd. 16V 2.0CR


1985 VW Golf 5-spd, 4-door, 1.6NA  Bought from orig. owner in Savannah with 42,000 miles.
"Making the jump NA to TD" slow but sure.

1980 VW Rabbit LS 5-spd, 4-door 1.6NA almost 450,000miles  RIP

Reply #14May 26, 2010, 09:22:25 am

burn_your_money

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8999
  • Personal Text
    Bright, On
Re: New Giles 1.6 NA pump. What next?
« Reply #14 on: May 26, 2010, 09:22:25 am »
I also rebuild my injectors to the bottom of the specs rather then the top.

pop pressure?

Yes
Tyler