S-PAutomotive.com

Author Topic: Final consensus on timing advance mod ?  (Read 2270 times)

July 02, 2008, 01:16:48 pm

diffdude

  • User+

  • Offline
  • *

  • 39
Final consensus on timing advance mod ?
« on: July 02, 2008, 01:16:48 pm »
What is everyone final outcome to the timing advance piston cover mod?
Or machining the piston itself.

I searched past posts and cant find anyone who has responded back after doing it.

I was looking at a pump I have apart and if you take the cold start cover off and replace it with a cover from the other side and did the mod to it you could have much more advance. If that makes sence.


81 caddy 1.6 td, 2.5" turbo back, snow performance water/meth injection, and all the other usual mods.

Reply #1July 02, 2008, 02:26:49 pm

saurkraut

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 904
Final consensus on timing advance mod ?
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2008, 02:26:49 pm »
Page 3, I think:

Quote from: "Black Smokin' Diesel"
Quote from: "ODwyerPW"
black smokin diesel,

any change in your mileage? any more smoke?


Sorry about the late response :lol: Nope, absolutely no change in mileage and smoke.


Zero, Zilch, Nada.

It appears to be a worthless "mod".
'79 1.6TD RABBIT
'84 1.5TD RABBIT
'83 Diesel Westy
'86 Audi 5000 Turbo Quatro Wagon
92 Audi 100
'93 Eurovan
'82 Porsche 930

Reply #2July 02, 2008, 04:54:24 pm

jimfoo

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 2110
    • http://www.66rover.com
Final consensus on timing advance mod ?
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2008, 04:54:24 pm »
Probably beneficial for an M-TDI pump though, as they can use more advance.
Jim
1966 Land-Rover 88" with 1.9 1Z which has been transformed to an M-TDI
TFO35 mechanically controlled VNT, IC , and 2.5" exhaust.
Driven daily

Reply #3July 03, 2008, 10:11:32 am

zukgod1

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 2817
Final consensus on timing advance mod ?
« Reply #3 on: July 03, 2008, 10:11:32 am »
Quote from: "saurkraut"
Page 3, I think:

Quote from: "Black Smokin' Diesel"
Quote from: "ODwyerPW"
black smokin diesel,

any change in your mileage? any more smoke?


Sorry about the late response :lol: Nope, absolutely no change in mileage and smoke.


Zero, Zilch, Nada.

It appears to be a worthless "mod".




I'm right here as well.

I don't doubt that it does something in the upper RPM range but as far as "feel" theres nada.

I didn't notice any MPG difference of mileage.
dan

99 Golf TDI (now CNG powered) , 82 TD Caddy

Reply #4July 08, 2008, 03:59:59 pm

mdonau

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 53
Final consensus on timing advance mod ?
« Reply #4 on: July 08, 2008, 03:59:59 pm »
hi,

i am running a 10mm plunger on a 1,9TD "AAZ" with 1,9L 130HP PD-TDI gearbox.

the timing-advance-spring ist changed to a softer one from a galloper/pajero (thats also, where the plunger came from)

milage dropped from about 6,5l/100km to 5l/100km. (don't know what that is in MPG ;) )

but 5l/100km is 20km/l..and thats quite good i think

greets, michael
Audi 80 1,6TD:
http://rapsdb.rapsinfo.de/detail.php?id=1807
1,9l TD conversion done!

Reply #5July 08, 2008, 05:31:57 pm

jtanguay

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 6879
Final consensus on timing advance mod ?
« Reply #5 on: July 08, 2008, 05:31:57 pm »
lowering your cruising rpm's is definitey a good thing  8)  the only problem being, and some might argue, is the low rpm deposits left in the engine.  taking it for a nice 'run' every once in a while should cure it though  :twisted:


This is how we deal with porn spammers! You've been warned.