Author Topic: TD vs NA crank?  (Read 3433 times)

February 02, 2008, 04:01:34 pm

MaxHedrm

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 114
    • blog
TD vs NA crank?
« on: February 02, 2008, 04:01:34 pm »
I'm considering a TD block & head listed over in the classifieds, but have a question...

Is the TD crank the same as the NA crank? I know where I can get new pistons for it, but have no idea on the crank, so I am wondering if reusing mine would be doable.

DRIVE: 2010 Golf TDI
DRIVE (less): 2001 TT Roadster

Reply #1February 02, 2008, 04:22:11 pm

MJF

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 581
TD vs NA crank?
« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2008, 04:22:11 pm »
It is same.
'74 VW Scirocco TD
'86 Audi 80q 1,9TDic
'01 Audi A6q 2,5TDI

Reply #2February 02, 2008, 05:33:46 pm

CoolAirVw

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 175
TD vs NA crank?
« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2008, 05:33:46 pm »
Below is cut and pasted from the white paper, cut from the section specifically for turbo diesels.  I seem to remember something about Ion-nitriding also??????

Quote from: ""
A number of changes were made to the crankshaft. The front end of the crankshaft was reinforced. The highly loaded crank-pin, at cylinder 4, has its radius induction hardened and the oil hole ground while radii at the other pins are roll-hardened.


But.... the non-turbo crank will fit.  The question is will it last as well????
85 Jetta Turbo Diesel
75 Porsche 914
93 GMC Truck
99 Caravan <--wifes gotta drive something :)

Reply #3February 02, 2008, 05:49:13 pm

RabbitJockey

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 5104
  • Personal Text
    America, DUCK YEAH!!!
TD vs NA crank?
« Reply #3 on: February 02, 2008, 05:49:13 pm »
my money is on it lasting just fine
01 Jetta TDI 100% stock daily
81 Rabbit:TDI-M ported head, Frank06 cam, PD intake, hybrid T3 turbo, Renault intercooler, Syl20 11mm pump, light weight fw, and yellow California Clutch clutch kit

Reply #4February 02, 2008, 06:52:38 pm

jtanguay

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 6879
TD vs NA crank?
« Reply #4 on: February 02, 2008, 06:52:38 pm »
i'm suspecting that if its a hydraulic engine that it MIGHT have the turbo spec crankshaft.  they really over-engineered the crankshaft for the turbo.  it can withstand more than double, or even triple (as MJF has produced 200+ hp  :shock: with one)

you're not looking for 160 hp are you?  :lol:  should be fine.  just get the crank polished before you re-install it  :wink:


This is how we deal with porn spammers! You've been warned.

Reply #5February 02, 2008, 08:02:42 pm

935racer

  • Guest
TD vs NA crank?
« Reply #5 on: February 02, 2008, 08:02:42 pm »
Quote from: "jtanguay"
i'm suspecting that if its a hydraulic engine that it MIGHT have the turbo spec crankshaft.  they really over-engineered the crankshaft for the turbo.  it can withstand more than double, or even triple (as MJF has produced 200+ hp  :shock: with one)

you're not looking for 160 hp are you?  :lol:  should be fine.  just get the crank polished before you re-install it  :wink:


Yeah my 1.6 dynod 193.5whp with the td crank today, should have made more but my wastegate was opening too much, should have a 200+ dyno next week.

Reply #6February 02, 2008, 08:11:31 pm

jtanguay

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 6879
TD vs NA crank?
« Reply #6 on: February 02, 2008, 08:11:31 pm »
Quote from: "935racer"
Quote from: "jtanguay"
i'm suspecting that if its a hydraulic engine that it MIGHT have the turbo spec crankshaft.  they really over-engineered the crankshaft for the turbo.  it can withstand more than double, or even triple (as MJF has produced 200+ hp  :shock: with one)

you're not looking for 160 hp are you?  :lol:  should be fine.  just get the crank polished before you re-install it  :wink:


Yeah my 1.6 dynod 193.5whp with the td crank today, should have made more but my wastegate was opening too much, should have a 200+ dyno next week.


on a 1.6??? SWEET!!!! would be cool if you sold a whole 1.6 stage 5 kit including Giles pump... 200 whp  :evil:  (including your ported head, manifolds, dp, and anything else one might need...?  i would almost like to try that on a bone stock 1.6TD (except maybe with the ported head) to see how long it lasted  :lol:

if a 1.6TD rated at around 68hp can make 200 hp, then a TDI rated at 90 using the same ratio be able to make around 260 hp, but the torque would be insane!  :twisted:


This is how we deal with porn spammers! You've been warned.

Reply #7February 02, 2008, 08:18:21 pm

935racer

  • Guest
TD vs NA crank?
« Reply #7 on: February 02, 2008, 08:18:21 pm »
Yeah on my 1.6/1.9 head combo, I've been driving it hard for the last month or so, no issue, runs great. I am a bit disapointed to be honest, the only time I had this wastegate issue was on the dyno today, I hit 28-29 psi when my wastegate open and a second later it drops down to 22 psi, tried it on the road after the dyno run and no problem holding 28 psi all the way to 180km/h in 4th gear with the current 4s tranny (5800rpm).



For some reason I clicked time on the printout instead of rpm for the bottom of the graph, I'll fix that on monday back at the shop, did I mention the new shop has a dyno 8)

Reply #8February 02, 2008, 08:20:55 pm

jtanguay

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 6879
TD vs NA crank?
« Reply #8 on: February 02, 2008, 08:20:55 pm »
how are you controlling the wastegate? is it just disconnected or are you running a controller?


This is how we deal with porn spammers! You've been warned.

Reply #9February 02, 2008, 08:22:22 pm

935racer

  • Guest
TD vs NA crank?
« Reply #9 on: February 02, 2008, 08:22:22 pm »
You can see where my torque and HP are doing great and are fairly flat and than they drop quite a bit, that is when my boost dropped big time from my wastegate issue, where it completely stops is when I let off the throttle at 6k rpm

Reply #10February 02, 2008, 08:23:40 pm

935racer

  • Guest
TD vs NA crank?
« Reply #10 on: February 02, 2008, 08:23:40 pm »
I am using a manual boost controller, I am going to get a good electronic boost controller like an apexi and do a few other things and try for 210 on this setup, after that its time for new manifolds, different turbo, bigger pump and 240whp :twisted:

Reply #11February 03, 2008, 12:43:49 am

MJF

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 581
TD vs NA crank?
« Reply #11 on: February 03, 2008, 12:43:49 am »
Quote from: "jtanguay"
i'm suspecting that if its a hydraulic engine that it MIGHT have the turbo spec crankshaft.  they really over-engineered the crankshaft for the turbo.  it can withstand more than double, or even triple (as MJF has produced 200+ hp  :shock: with one)


Actually there is early 1.6NA crank in my engine 8) I like the old style crank front end better...
'74 VW Scirocco TD
'86 Audi 80q 1,9TDic
'01 Audi A6q 2,5TDI

Reply #12February 03, 2008, 11:19:05 am

MaxHedrm

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 114
    • blog
TD vs NA crank?
« Reply #12 on: February 03, 2008, 11:19:05 am »
Quote from: "MJF"
Actually there is early 1.6NA crank in my engine 8) I like the old style crank front end better...


So since I'm not planning to go anywhere near 200hp, I should have nothing to worry about. Good to know.  :)

DRIVE: 2010 Golf TDI
DRIVE (less): 2001 TT Roadster