Author Topic: Fuel Economy mods  (Read 7201 times)

Reply #15October 28, 2007, 09:59:24 pm

tylernt

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 344
Fuel Economy mods
« Reply #15 on: October 28, 2007, 09:59:24 pm »
Quote from: "madmedix"
Actually, the skinnier tire will help you in the snow.
Interesting. That's the second time I've heard that, but it sounds counter-intuitive. Wider tires = more contact patch = more traction in snow, no? Please explain, I'm curious now. :)

Thanks,
'82 Diesel Rabbit, '88 Fox RIP, '88 Jetta (work in progress)

Reply #16October 28, 2007, 10:40:37 pm

jtanguay

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 6879
Fuel Economy mods
« Reply #16 on: October 28, 2007, 10:40:37 pm »
i believe it has to do with 'cutting' through the snow.  the wider tire surface will spread the weight of the car out on the surface giving you less psi which means less grip.  skinnier tires will sink easier in snow.

but if you buy a really good snow tire, the actual size shouldn't really matter much.  you will notice that snow tires have large spaces between the treads to allow snow to compact in those areas, which then allows the rubber to get something to grip on (if the snow isn't too deep of course)

the problem with winter tires is that they wear much quicker due to the fact that the treads are more spread out, and give poorer mileage as well. a trade off for safety of course.

anyone with a better explanation feel free to take a crack at it! :)


This is how we deal with porn spammers! You've been warned.

Reply #17October 29, 2007, 02:30:00 am

clbanman

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 705
  • Personal Text
    Cambridge, Ontario
Fuel Economy mods
« Reply #17 on: October 29, 2007, 02:30:00 am »
You're right about cutting through the snow.  Think of it this way, if your tires are 10" wide, and you are going through 5" of snow, not all of that snow can be compacted into the spaces in the treads.  If you walk beside a car that is driving (slowly) through deep snow, you will see that some snow gets pushed out to the side.  If your tires were only 5" wide, a higher percentage of the snow under your tire could be pushed to the side, and your tires have a better chance of getting to pavement (gravel, whatever).   One thing I have been told and believe from my own experience is that this matters more if you have slush at the base of the snow. If you have no slush between the road and the snow, the snow that compacts into the tire treads actually helps grip the snow under your tires and increases traction.
Calvin
91 VW Golf 1.6NA 5spd

Reply #18October 29, 2007, 07:27:34 am

tylernt

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 344
Fuel Economy mods
« Reply #18 on: October 29, 2007, 07:27:34 am »
Thanks for the explanation guys. Now I feel better about going from 165 wide tires to 155 to improve fuel economy... I was worried they would be like ice skates in the winter. ;)
'82 Diesel Rabbit, '88 Fox RIP, '88 Jetta (work in progress)

Reply #19October 29, 2007, 09:06:10 am

Black Smokin' Diesel

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 656
Fuel Economy mods
« Reply #19 on: October 29, 2007, 09:06:10 am »
Quote from: "tylernt"
Thanks for the explanation guys. Now I feel better about going from 165 wide tires to 155 to improve fuel economy... I was worried they would be like ice skates in the winter. ;)


I've got 155/70/13 snow tires and they are good, it's a nice size.
91 Passat syncro 1.8T swapped.

Reply #20October 29, 2007, 10:54:15 am

zukgod1

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 2817
Fuel Economy mods
« Reply #20 on: October 29, 2007, 10:54:15 am »
Well I'm going from a 205/40r17 to a 185/65r15 for snow tires.
This is on my mk3 gasser, I have 205/60r14's on my mk2.

Still getting close to 35 on the gasser with the 17's.
Cool thing is all the wheels I have will fit either car.


dan
dan

99 Golf TDI (now CNG powered) , 82 TD Caddy

Reply #21October 29, 2007, 11:09:17 am

92Wolfsburg

  • Guest
Fuel Economy mods
« Reply #21 on: October 29, 2007, 11:09:17 am »
Dan: Any clearance issues with the larger tires on your MK III?

Reply #22October 30, 2007, 03:50:48 pm

madmedix

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 204
Fuel Economy mods
« Reply #22 on: October 30, 2007, 03:50:48 pm »
Where I grew up summer was three months of bad skiing. Of course, that was before the new technology rubber compounds came about...but those are only really good for ice contact. Back in '96 I bought a '92 Golf NA that came with Hallipalitta (sp?) snow tires. They were incredible, especially on ice...but VERY soft compound. Wore out right quick.
One thing to keep in mind though, if you go with a skinnier tire and there is enough snow on your roads to "rut" the road....your car will follow them like mad.
'90 TD Jetta

Reply #23November 10, 2007, 04:48:20 pm

pascalb18

  • Newbie

  • Offline
  • *

  • 3
Save On Fuel with the DBF-4
« Reply #23 on: November 10, 2007, 04:48:20 pm »
There are test made by ITAQ saying that the Jetta save 14% on Fuel using the DBF-4 from PROLAB-Technologies. It's the best on the market, also if you never want to have any problems with the whole fuel system. It cleans, lubricates the pump, eliminate water and it's not "oil base" so, environment friendly and it burns clean and biodegradable. At only 20$ for 1L that treats 2000L... .01$/L of fuel, it's definitly the cheapest also!

The website:

http://www.prolab-technologies.com/contenu/produitsAutoDetail_ang.cfm?noFicheProduit=135

Have a look at the tests:

http://www.prolab-technologies.com/multimedia_ang.htm
2001 Jetta TDI
Prolab Anti-Friction Lubs
DBF-4 Diesel Conditioner

Reply #24November 10, 2007, 06:39:30 pm

subsonic

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 1836
Fuel Economy mods
« Reply #24 on: November 10, 2007, 06:39:30 pm »
What a suprise, all 3 of your posts say the same thing.  Shocking.  Post to post salesman? :P
2009 Jetta TDI Loyal edition, 6-spd. 16V 2.0CR


1985 VW Golf 5-spd, 4-door, 1.6NA  Bought from orig. owner in Savannah with 42,000 miles.
"Making the jump NA to TD" slow but sure.

1980 VW Rabbit LS 5-spd, 4-door 1.6NA almost 450,000miles  RIP