wouldn't heavier give better fuel mileage though? but suck for accel big time?
<snip>When change my currently slipping clutch I will cut the flywheel down as much as is possible. I love my 1.9 with the light flywheel. There are no drawbacks that I can see.
Quote from: "QuickTD"<snip>When change my currently slipping clutch I will cut the flywheel down as much as is possible. I love my 1.9 with the light flywheel. There are no drawbacks that I can see.There is one potential issue with lightened flywheels. The flywheel smooths out the pulses from the power strokes. With a lighter flywheel, the crankshaft speed is more pulsed, especially at low RPM's. This puts some additional stress on the timing belt from the sudden acceleration/deceleration of the engine parts. With a lighter flywheel, you'll want to check the timing belt more frequently. Look for cracks or wear at the base of the teeth. And you might want to shorten the timing belt change interval some with a lighter flywheel. I'm not trying to scare you into not running a lighter flywheel. A lighter flywheel does help acceleration a bit. I run a lighter one on my diesel for that reason. I start checking my timing belt at 30,000 miles now, and I changed it at 45,000 miles just to play it safe. Just be aware that the timing belt is under more stress with the lighter flywheel and don't drive it until the belt snaps.
Stan is right... for all-out racing, they use the smallest clutch and flywheel that you can get away with.Here is the thread where I describe my setup:http://www.hostboard.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=4037&t=40I actually have a 200mm setup. But based on my research I actually heard some conflicting opinions on which setup would ultimately be lighter (190mm or 200mm) but for sure either are pounds lighter than a 210mm setup.The OD of the flywheel is the starter engagement teeth, which is the same for all the clutch diameters. What changes is the OD of the clutch disc (smaller OD = slightly lighter clutch) and the OD of the pressure plate (smaller OD = significantly lighter pressure plate, by like 2 pounds or more going from 210mm to 200 or 190mm.) I have heard that the 190mm, 200mm, and 210mm flywheels should weigh about the same after they've all been lightened to about the max limits, but then again it depends on the skill of the machinist doing the lightening. Where the weighs gets saved by reducing clutch diameter is mainly in the pressure plate.Here are some pictures of my setup taken from the thread mentioned above:
Does anyone have any mileage numbers of before and after adding a lightened flywheel? And also of the claimed torque loss?
Heavy spinning objects require less energy to maintain a constant speed correct?
my clutch is slippy. engine is a 1990 1.6l TD MF code.so now i'm going to replace my clutch.. what is my best bet? will the stock 1.6l TD clutch and pressure plate hold upwards of 200ft/Ibs? 180ft/Ibs or there abouts?
What size flywheel comes stock on a 1985 1.6L TD? If I went to the mentioned 210mm setup with a 16v pressure plate and clutch disc, is it all direct bolt up or does anything have to be changed? Also, is it the 1.8 or 2.0L 16v? Oh, one last question - when you say you lighten it to 8lbs, is that taking 8lbs off of it or it it lightening it to a final weight of 8 lbs? Thanks guys, this info will really help as my clutch is sliping terribly too.