-
#120
by
Alcaid
on 13 Mar, 2013 10:55
-
-
#121
by
JamesT
on 14 Mar, 2013 00:22
-
I would say somewhere around 16cc per cylinder would hydrolock. Of course that would be theoretical. There would have to be some room for air.
-
#122
by
R.O.R-2.0
on 14 Mar, 2013 22:00
-
the pump is rated @ 90cc/min i believe.. not 90cc/stroke..
think of it, the pump plunger would need to be the size of a honda 90 piston to put out 90cc/stroke!
-
#123
by
Jetmugg
on 14 Mar, 2013 22:53
-
That's good thinking right there. I got a little carried away.
Steve.
-
#124
by
Alcaid
on 15 Mar, 2013 02:47
-
Actually pumps are rated in cc / 1000 strokes
-
#125
by
Jetmugg
on 15 Mar, 2013 08:47
-
Actually pumps are rated in cc / 1000 strokes
That's even better thinking.
-
#126
by
R.O.R-2.0
on 15 Mar, 2013 15:20
-
Actually pumps are rated in cc / 1000 strokes
thank you.. wasnt sure if it was a timed reading like gasser fuel injector flow, or something else..
90cc/stroke sounded out of the question..
90cc/min sounded more plausible..
but 90cc/1000strokes, that makes ALOT more sense..
-
#127
by
RabbitJockey
on 28 Mar, 2013 11:11
-
-
#128
by
Jetmugg
on 28 Mar, 2013 15:55
-
I will probably end up with one of the BFI flywheels. I already have a 210mm pressure plate & clutch setup.
Steve.
-
#129
by
RabbitJockey
on 28 Mar, 2013 19:03
-
i had no idea they had those billet wheels, im thinking they just now came out?
-
#130
by
theman53
on 27 Jul, 2013 12:21
-
Where are you at with this mr jetmugg
-
#131
by
Jetmugg
on 01 Aug, 2013 15:27
-
-
#132
by
Jetmugg
on 01 Aug, 2013 15:31
-
-
#133
by
carrizog60
on 01 Aug, 2013 17:19
-
i think 0.95 wouldnt be enough advance...
-
#134
by
theman53
on 01 Aug, 2013 21:35
-
On a performance pump like mine and his .95 maybe too much for the high rpm, but not too too much that it is horribly bad. Giles told me between .90 and .95, his pump builder probably did the same. The only thing I would do different is take that red line at 5500 rpm and move it to 6,000