Author Topic: MPG's, caddy VS rabbit  (Read 5856 times)

October 14, 2006, 11:40:38 am

superman293

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 93
MPG's, caddy VS rabbit
« on: October 14, 2006, 11:40:38 am »
Im in the market to buy a rabbit, im looking at years 80-82(I want to use historic tags) It would be nice to have a Rabit truck(caddy) but  I will be putting alot of miles on it and Im concered about the loss in MPGs. Can anyone tell me how many MPG's I would be loseing  if I were to purchase a rabbit(4door) VS the caddy pickup?
thanks very much

Reply #1October 16, 2006, 07:48:42 am

tadleyjane

  • User+

  • Offline
  • *

  • 20
MPG's, caddy VS rabbit
« Reply #1 on: October 16, 2006, 07:48:42 am »
I have a 1981 Caddy, working on improving the airflow-just a front airdam so far- and I am consistently getting 42-44mpg driving 25%town and 75% highway(at 70mph) every week driving a total of 550miles/week.  I have the 1.6na and a 5spd slinging an a/c pulley.  Best of luck with your decision-caddy's are hard to find but are available.  Tad

Reply #2October 16, 2006, 01:15:59 pm

Justin

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 455
MPG's, caddy VS rabbit
« Reply #2 on: October 16, 2006, 01:15:59 pm »
everyone says that the drag is greater with the caddy but with the same engine I was able to achieve up to 51mpg, and in a 4 door 84 rabbit I cannot get over 46, ussually 42, but the caddy was consistently above 44 mpg (probably the bearings and or alignment
www.archeryprostaffmi.com
1985 GMC pickup 4x4 lift kit and runs 14.625 @ 91mph
1982 VW rabbit pickup 1.6L just rebuilt, 100mm cv's, 02A transmission
1997 Geo Tracker 1.9 TDI-M, variable gate turbo, Giles Pump

Reply #3October 16, 2006, 02:17:11 pm

burn_your_money

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 8999
  • Personal Text
    Bright, On
MPG's, caddy VS rabbit
« Reply #3 on: October 16, 2006, 02:17:11 pm »
Get rid of that AC for starters.

What tranny do you have?
Tyler

Reply #4October 16, 2006, 06:28:12 pm

Justin

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 455
MPG's, caddy VS rabbit
« Reply #4 on: October 16, 2006, 06:28:12 pm »
the 84 4 door isnt ac, and does not have power steering. I ran the same tranny in both, it was an ff 5 speed. now I run the 4a 4 speed since the 4th gear and final drive is a little better than my ff plus a limited slip
www.archeryprostaffmi.com
1985 GMC pickup 4x4 lift kit and runs 14.625 @ 91mph
1982 VW rabbit pickup 1.6L just rebuilt, 100mm cv's, 02A transmission
1997 Geo Tracker 1.9 TDI-M, variable gate turbo, Giles Pump

Reply #5October 17, 2006, 09:52:54 am

derek510galaxy

  • Newbie

  • Offline
  • *

  • 9
MPG's, caddy VS rabbit
« Reply #5 on: October 17, 2006, 09:52:54 am »
Superman, I don't think the Caddy is the aerodynamic dog, actually it's probably more the other way around. Rabbits have a pretty horrific drag coefficient with such a vertical windscreen and truncated tail, as well as other problems. In actuality, pickup trucks in general ( without bed caps ) with flat bed tonneaus and a small horizontal tailgate spoiler ( like the plastic tailgate extension on Chevy trucks ) conform to the preferred 15 degree departure angle from the back of the cab to the top of the tailgate. Make sure you use a decent front spoiler. You want to shear off the air going under the truck, not to let it "see" all the junk underneath like control arms and such.
1979 Rabbit TD (in the works)
1983 Rabbit GTI (350,000 miles)

Reply #6December 05, 2006, 09:13:03 pm

sprstu

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 99
MPG's, caddy VS rabbit
« Reply #6 on: December 05, 2006, 09:13:03 pm »
i wonder how much, if any, the weight difference makes. the caddy i would assume to be lighter, helping get the better mileage.
Mk1 caddy TD, mk4 Golf Tdi