S-PAutomotive.com

Author Topic: optimal exhaust size  (Read 10183 times)

Reply #45December 30, 2007, 02:52:35 pm

jimfoo

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 2110
    • http://www.66rover.com
optimal exhaust size
« Reply #45 on: December 30, 2007, 02:52:35 pm »
I have heard that cherry bombs actually have a fair amount of back pressure, even though you wouldn't think so.
Jim
1966 Land-Rover 88" with 1.9 1Z which has been transformed to an M-TDI
TFO35 mechanically controlled VNT, IC , and 2.5" exhaust.
Driven daily

Reply #46December 31, 2007, 10:36:05 am

bevboyy

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 200
optimal exhaust size
« Reply #46 on: December 31, 2007, 10:36:05 am »
I highly doubt that. They are basically a straight through glasspack. There is nothing in the exhausts way to cause any type of turbulence. They are highest flow next to straight pipe.
1987 Jetta Mk2 - daily driver, MZ 1.8 goodness. TJ auto trans..

Gone but not forgotten:
1985 Mercedes 300d Turbo
1987 Olds Delta 88 Royal Brougham
1992 Mercedes 190e 2.3
1984 Mercedes 190e
1983 Quantum TD
1992 Jetta TD
1983 BMW 533i
1982 BMW 320iS
1979 Mercedes 300D (non turbo)
1977 BMW

Reply #47December 31, 2007, 11:19:43 am

jimfoo

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 2110
    • http://www.66rover.com
optimal exhaust size
« Reply #47 on: December 31, 2007, 11:19:43 am »
Years ago I used to work as a parts runner for an auto parts shop. At one of my stops, they had a chart of various brands & designs of mufflers and the back pressure. While the glasspacks were low, they weren't the lowest. I don't know if the ones they had were the louvered or perforated inner core, but I can see the louvered ones creating a fair bit of turbulence inside. The one with the lowest BP was a flowmaster or dynomax or something like that. It was years and years ago and I don't remember any more.
Jim
1966 Land-Rover 88" with 1.9 1Z which has been transformed to an M-TDI
TFO35 mechanically controlled VNT, IC , and 2.5" exhaust.
Driven daily

 

Fixmyvw.com