S-PAutomotive.com

Author Topic: Turbo upgrade, which one.  (Read 13354 times)

Reply #30October 16, 2010, 10:17:49 am

jack's lack

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 275
Re: Turbo upgrade, which one.
« Reply #30 on: October 16, 2010, 10:17:49 am »
YES

I can't wait to find out what this does. I am still on the fence teetering between twin turbos or a decent sized hybrid VNT.
I think twins would definitely draw more attention at car shows. MKIV kids, and gasser kids wouldn't even notice a clever vane control setup on an IDI diesel ::), but they would certainly snap a pic or ten of that monster Holset and all that piping. I'm all for form follows function, but you have to admit it's twice as cool to double spool 8) 8)

Keep up the good work, and please keep posting pics. You are certainly braver than I am. 

Cheers
1982 Rabbit diesel L 4 door
AAZ, K14, Giles pump, PD150 intake, P&P'd head, ceramic coated pistons, 2.5" stainless down pipe & exhaust. FK coils

My Build Thread

Reply #31October 16, 2010, 10:40:11 am

RadoTD

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 513
  • Personal Text
    Stage WTF
Re: Turbo upgrade, which one.
« Reply #31 on: October 16, 2010, 10:40:11 am »
Wow, that looks awesome! I'll definitely be watching this..

enough boost is when you have 3 dimple marks in the hood from the valve cover nuts..  ;D

Reply #32October 16, 2010, 03:08:54 pm

RabbitJockey

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 5064
  • Personal Text
    America, DUCK YEAH!!!
Re: Turbo upgrade, which one.
« Reply #32 on: October 16, 2010, 03:08:54 pm »
looks awesome, great work, i am curious how the k14 will do, and how the hx30 will do its a turbo i've been wanting to run for a while
01 Jetta TDI 100% stock daily
81 Rabbit:TDI-M ported head, Frank06 cam, PD intake, hybrid T3 turbo, Renault intercooler, Syl20 11mm pump, light weight fw, and yellow California Clutch clutch kit

Reply #33October 16, 2010, 06:30:04 pm

bugnut

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 89
Re: Turbo upgrade, which one.
« Reply #33 on: October 16, 2010, 06:30:04 pm »
Thanks for the compliments on the build.  I know the welds look like crap but hey, we all have to start at some time or another. 


The hx35 is too big. nuff said. I have one on my table. It's too big even for a heavily ported, fueled up 1.9. Glad you went with the 30. VERY nice work. I'm envious.
How did you get involved with the diesel dubs? Usually people dont start insanity of this caliber until they've had a few years with the moderately sane debauchery that IS IDI VWs

This hx30 is still big.  There is no way I could fit that 35 in the rabbit.  right now I had to tilt the hx30 to clear my shifter and some of the frame.  I might end up cutting some of the frame for the air inlet. If I do I will box it up and make it stronger than factory. 
 As for diesel and performance I can't leave anything stock.  It all started with a few mods here and there and now look at it.  I have done the same with my dodge diesel's.  I had my 02 at 550hp and my 93 has the pump mods while the 07 just has a dpf delete, it has plenty of power for now.   What really got me started was my vw ghia and bug.  The aircooled engines are so nice to work on.  Want a bigger bore, no problem buy some new jugs and there you have it. I am alsot working on my bug right now.  The engine is now a 2387 fuel injection turbo monster. Should be in the 400hp mark.

looks awesome, great work, i am curious how the k14 will do, and how the hx30 will do its a turbo i've been wanting to run for a while
I am wondering too how this k14 will do.  I do have a 45mm gate I am adding to this build.  That should take care of the k14 not over spooling before the hx30 kicks in.  I guess we'll see when the tires hit the road.  ;)
1980 Rabbit  1.9/1.6 franko engine.  compound built in the works

Reply #34October 16, 2010, 09:44:01 pm

Smokey Eddy

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 3468
    • McScrubbins Body Wash
Re: Turbo upgrade, which one.
« Reply #34 on: October 16, 2010, 09:44:01 pm »
My T3 is too small, time for a bigger one. I can peg my pyro gauge right now with the T3 while boost is at 30psi. That is with water injection.

Do you have an intercooler? This happened to me also very quickly. I added an intercooler and limited the t3 to 18 pounds. much lower egts and more torque. lower top end though but that may be due to other changes too like timing and what not.
the t3 will start to work against you once you go past it's efficiency range. Keep this in mind with your twin set up now but your numbers look dead on! i'm stoked to see that all working together.
« Last Edit: October 16, 2010, 09:55:01 pm by Smokey Eddy »
Ed
Blacked out mk2 AAZ Jetta RIP. You are missed.
White 1999.5 ALH Golf 2dr. Low & wide. Rammed off the road RIP.
Blue 2009 CR140 Jetta CBEA/CJAA. Malone stage 2. EGR/DPF/Exhaust-valve deletes. 2.5" open exhaust. ADP Turbo swap. 1-stage nitrous kit. THROWN ROD

Reply #35October 18, 2010, 01:47:29 am

bugnut

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 89
Re: Turbo upgrade, which one.
« Reply #35 on: October 18, 2010, 01:47:29 am »
I do have it intercooled.  I tried turning the boost down to 25psi and it was still way to hot and a lot of black smoke.  So I figured I needed more air to burn the fuel.  This hx30 should do the job while the k14 will help with the low end.  I would have done more testing on pressure but that is when I bent the rod.  I am thinking what bent the rod was 3 things.  My water injection, i just changed to a larger jet. I bumped the timing up and hear it ratting on the top end and the intake design.  I think all the water was being put into #1 cylinder.  That is the rod that got bent.  So I am going to make a new intake plenum. 


1980 Rabbit  1.9/1.6 franko engine.  compound built in the works

Reply #36October 18, 2010, 12:35:17 pm

bugnut

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 89
Re: Turbo upgrade, which one.
« Reply #36 on: October 18, 2010, 12:35:17 pm »
i am concerned about that too.  I did read that you can have up to 15* tilt from perpendicular.  A rough look at the hx30 it is in the ballpark of 13*.  I need to get my level on it, I just put a protractor on it real quick. 

Every spot I put the turbo it would hit something that is untill I tilted it.  Then it would clear the shifter and I can get a hose on for the intake. 
1980 Rabbit  1.9/1.6 franko engine.  compound built in the works

Reply #37October 18, 2010, 01:53:25 pm

truckinwagen

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 1895
Re: Turbo upgrade, which one.
« Reply #37 on: October 18, 2010, 01:53:25 pm »
There are lots of OEM applications where the turbo is tilted like  that. The TD Isuzu p'up had a turbo tilted like that. And lots of turbo jimmies in trucks have them leaning like that to fit the monster turbos under the hood.

I would not worry until it actually leaks. My money is on it running without issue.
83 Opel Kadett Diesel

Reply #38October 18, 2010, 04:30:52 pm

gldgti

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 488
    • http://scramjetsite.8m.com
Re: Turbo upgrade, which one.
« Reply #38 on: October 18, 2010, 04:30:52 pm »
Yes, logically, if you have 50+psi of oil pressure in the bearing housing, whether the thing is tilted forwards or back with respect to gravity likely wont make any difference while its running. Its likely fairly important that on shutdown most of the oil can drain our of the housing (eventually), or it will seep past the seal on one side.
'77 Golf LS 4 door twincharger project
'91 Golf Cabrio 1.9TD
'94 Golf TD - AAZ, 2.5" Mandrel DP and exhaust, Merc T3 1.6TD boost pin, FMIC, Koni suspension, VR6 Brakes, VR6 Seats, VR6 sway-bars - sadly missed
'07 SKODA Octavia 1.9 TDI PD - Remapped ECU

Reply #39October 18, 2010, 05:18:44 pm

RabbitJockey

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 5064
  • Personal Text
    America, DUCK YEAH!!!
Re: Turbo upgrade, which one.
« Reply #39 on: October 18, 2010, 05:18:44 pm »
i wouldn't worry about the tilting, i have seen some titled much further, there was a guy on vortex with a stock long block aba in a rabbit making 380whp on ethanol his turbo was really slanted i think he said you could go 30 degrees, that sounds like alot tho haha

what i really wonder tho is if the k14 will end up being a bottle neck more than a torque maker, and if you'd be better off with the hx30 by it self,  time will tell
01 Jetta TDI 100% stock daily
81 Rabbit:TDI-M ported head, Frank06 cam, PD intake, hybrid T3 turbo, Renault intercooler, Syl20 11mm pump, light weight fw, and yellow California Clutch clutch kit

Reply #40October 18, 2010, 07:20:04 pm

RabbitJockey

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 5064
  • Personal Text
    America, DUCK YEAH!!!
Re: Turbo upgrade, which one.
« Reply #40 on: October 18, 2010, 07:20:04 pm »
http://forums.vwvortex.com/showthread.php?4829923-The-super-slappy-attack-rabbit.&highlight=400whp


heres the thread i was talking about, its quite odd to see a stock 8v make that much power damn
01 Jetta TDI 100% stock daily
81 Rabbit:TDI-M ported head, Frank06 cam, PD intake, hybrid T3 turbo, Renault intercooler, Syl20 11mm pump, light weight fw, and yellow California Clutch clutch kit

Reply #41October 19, 2010, 12:27:35 pm

bugnut

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 89
Re: Turbo upgrade, which one.
« Reply #41 on: October 19, 2010, 12:27:35 pm »
That was a good read on that build up.  That turbo has way more tilt than I got and looks like it worked.  Looks like I can give it a try.  As for the k14 being a bottle neck I would say it sure does look like it.  I hope it's not but time will tell.  If it is I will try swaping out the k14 for the t3 and see what that does.  I am almost done with the rest of the porting.  Just have a little more on the exhaust to do.  After that I will get the valve ground put the head back together.  Once I get this thing running there will be snow on the ground. 
1980 Rabbit  1.9/1.6 franko engine.  compound built in the works

Reply #42October 19, 2010, 03:28:20 pm

rabbitman

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 2787
Re: Turbo upgrade, which one.
« Reply #42 on: October 19, 2010, 03:28:20 pm »
My guess is as long as the drain is lower than the seal it will probably be fine.
'82 Rabbit, I put on a euro vnt-15, 2.25" DP, 2.5" exhaust, the result.....it whistled.

I removed the turbo, made a toilet bowl 2.5" DP, the result....it was deafening. Now it has a homemade muffler up front and a thrush in the rear, the result.....less loud.
Watch: AGENDA, GRINDING AMERICA DOWN

Reply #43October 20, 2010, 02:30:20 am

gldgti

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 488
    • http://scramjetsite.8m.com
Re: Turbo upgrade, which one.
« Reply #43 on: October 20, 2010, 02:30:20 am »
The shaft seals are not under any oil pressure at all.  The oil is fed to the bearings and once it leaks around the bearings it is under zero pressure.  The seals are on the zero pressure side and if under any pressure (e.g. poor drainage) will leak profusely.  If oil pools enough to reach the shaft seals even if it is not under any pressure other than gravity, they will also leak quite well.  That angle may not be enough to do so.  As I said, just a curiosity. 

quite right, whoopsy.
'77 Golf LS 4 door twincharger project
'91 Golf Cabrio 1.9TD
'94 Golf TD - AAZ, 2.5" Mandrel DP and exhaust, Merc T3 1.6TD boost pin, FMIC, Koni suspension, VR6 Brakes, VR6 Seats, VR6 sway-bars - sadly missed
'07 SKODA Octavia 1.9 TDI PD - Remapped ECU

Reply #44October 20, 2010, 05:39:51 pm

RabbitJockey

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 5064
  • Personal Text
    America, DUCK YEAH!!!
Re: Turbo upgrade, which one.
« Reply #44 on: October 20, 2010, 05:39:51 pm »
hillfolk told me a friend of his tried compounding a 1.6 t3 with a merc t3 and that the boost came on very very fast.  i really wonder how the holset would do on its own
01 Jetta TDI 100% stock daily
81 Rabbit:TDI-M ported head, Frank06 cam, PD intake, hybrid T3 turbo, Renault intercooler, Syl20 11mm pump, light weight fw, and yellow California Clutch clutch kit