S-PAutomotive.com

Author Topic: Why no 1.6l tdi?  (Read 12663 times)

Reply #30January 13, 2012, 05:36:06 am

MJF

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 581
Re: Why no 1.6l tdi?
« Reply #30 on: January 13, 2012, 05:36:06 am »
Maybe Nüral? 1,2 has 76,5mm bore and 24mm piston pin, that info can be found from Etka. That's all I know of that engine.
'74 VW Scirocco TD
'86 Audi 80q 1,9TDic
'01 Audi A6q 2,5TDI

Reply #31January 13, 2012, 06:31:48 am

mdonau

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 53
Re: Why no 1.6l tdi?
« Reply #31 on: January 13, 2012, 06:31:48 am »
hi,

I am currently building a 1,7l TDI using a 1,7 SDI (engine code "AKU")

The crankshaft, conrods and pistons fit perfecly into every 1,9l DI block.
The plan is to use this engine with stock 1Z/AHU components in my VW T3 Syncro

greets, michael
Audi 80 1,6TD:
http://rapsdb.rapsinfo.de/detail.php?id=1807
1,9l TD conversion done!

Reply #32January 13, 2012, 02:20:37 pm

R.O.R-2.0

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 7335
  • Personal Text
    Pacific Northwest - Oregon - USA
Re: Why no 1.6l tdi?
« Reply #32 on: January 13, 2012, 02:20:37 pm »
hi,

I am currently building a 1,7l TDI using a 1,7 SDI (engine code "AKU")

The crankshaft, conrods and pistons fit perfecly into every 1,9l DI block.
The plan is to use this engine with stock 1Z/AHU components in my VW T3 Syncro

greets, michael

a 1.7 SDI is basically a TDI already, just without a turbo..
92 Jetta GLI - Black, 1.6D w/ GT2056V turbo..
86 GTI - 4 Door, Med Twilight Gray, Tow Machine..
86 Audi Coupe GT - Tornado Red, All Stock.. WRECKED.
89 Toyota 4Runner - Dark Grey Metallic, LIFTED!

Turbo: exhaust gasses go into the turbocharger and spin it, witchcraft happens and you go faster.

Reply #33January 13, 2012, 07:39:34 pm

theman53

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 7837
  • Personal Text
    Holmes County Ohio - North Central Ohio
Re: Why no 1.6l tdi?
« Reply #33 on: January 13, 2012, 07:39:34 pm »
Maybe Nüral? 1,2 has 76,5mm bore and 24mm piston pin, that info can be found from Etka. That's all I know of that engine.
Need more info on this :D . I really would like to do a 1.6 TDI.

Reply #34January 13, 2012, 08:23:54 pm

MJF

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 581
'74 VW Scirocco TD
'86 Audi 80q 1,9TDic
'01 Audi A6q 2,5TDI

Reply #35January 13, 2012, 08:40:00 pm

theman53

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 7837
  • Personal Text
    Holmes County Ohio - North Central Ohio
Re: Why no 1.6l tdi?
« Reply #35 on: January 13, 2012, 08:40:00 pm »
Find me a 4th and I will.

Reply #36January 30, 2012, 01:55:24 am

JRD

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 158
Re: Why no 1.6l tdi?
« Reply #36 on: January 30, 2012, 01:55:24 am »
Alcan manufactured the 1.2L TDi pistons.
But I've not find anything on his site to know more about this pistons...  :(

Reply #37February 11, 2012, 04:54:11 pm

Pat Dolan

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 163
Re: Why no 1.6l tdi?
« Reply #37 on: February 11, 2012, 04:54:11 pm »
I do understand why someone might want a 1.6TDI to keep the old 1.6TD block fleet in heads into the future, but, honestly, if one is looking for economical engine - just buy a 1.2l or 1.4TDI and bolt it in.  The friction from 3 pistons will trump that from 4 any day. 

If one is fixated on 4 cylinders, then just start with a 1Z or AHU and put 20% taller gearing in place.  Now you have the same swept volume at the same road speed as the previously geared 1.6 4 banger - and you don't have to diddle at all with the engine.  Friction wise, the reduction in engine speed should proportionally offset the extra ring-to-wall drag from displacement.

The bonus, of course, is that you can just drop a gear and have all of that 1.9 litre sweetness when you need it - at no extra cost.

Some times, the pragmatic solution is just hiding well behind the obvious.
lifetime VW enthusiast, racer, fixer, addict, etc.
'03 TDI Variant, MkII Golf Country, Mk1 and II Scirocco (gassers), a Vanagon aircooled, an Audi 2.0 TD waiting to become a Porsche TD (in my M471 924), FLD120/DDEC IV, Ford 7.3/450, Iveco D220 and some 6D14T Mitsus and a few more.

Reply #38March 15, 2012, 07:57:40 pm

theman53

  • Global Moderator
  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ****

  • 7837
  • Personal Text
    Holmes County Ohio - North Central Ohio
Re: Why no 1.6l tdi?
« Reply #38 on: March 15, 2012, 07:57:40 pm »
I still am kicking this idea around. I may just buy those pistons and start measuring while the 1.6 is on the stand.

Reply #39March 27, 2012, 07:02:19 am

JRD

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 158
Re: Why no 1.6l tdi?
« Reply #39 on: March 27, 2012, 07:02:19 am »
I do understand why someone might want a 1.6TDI to keep the old 1.6TD block fleet in heads into the future, but, honestly, if one is looking for economical engine - just buy a 1.2l or 1.4TDI and bolt it in.  The friction from 3 pistons will trump that from 4 any day. 

If one is fixated on 4 cylinders, then just start with a 1Z or AHU and put 20% taller gearing in place.  Now you have the same swept volume at the same road speed as the previously geared 1.6 4 banger - and you don't have to diddle at all with the engine.  Friction wise, the reduction in engine speed should proportionally offset the extra ring-to-wall drag from displacement.

The bonus, of course, is that you can just drop a gear and have all of that 1.9 litre sweetness when you need it - at no extra cost.

Some times, the pragmatic solution is just hiding well behind the obvious.

I'm OK with you.
But, for me, building a 1,6L TDI is more difficult and interesting than swap a 1,4L TDI!