Author Topic: ceramic coating vs. oil squirters  (Read 2463 times)

March 07, 2008, 09:30:49 pm

shegel

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 312
ceramic coating vs. oil squirters
« on: March 07, 2008, 09:30:49 pm »
could i get away with just having the pistons ceramic coated and be able to run the car like a td. are there different cranks for the na than the td. basicly. im going to be building my motor soon and i want it to be a balance between power and reliability. . my budget is about 1k
1986 Golf 1.6l non turbo (R.I.P.)
1999.5 jetta (bought with 122145)
1969 karmann ghia(diesel swap dream)(most likely going to be subaru powered)
1998 jetta tdi (parents car)

Reply #1March 08, 2008, 01:26:59 am

mufflerbearing

  • Junior

  • Offline
  • **

  • 61
ceramic coating vs. oil squirters
« Reply #1 on: March 08, 2008, 01:26:59 am »
i am also interested in this

Reply #2March 08, 2008, 06:50:17 am

subsonic

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 1836
ceramic coating vs. oil squirters
« Reply #2 on: March 08, 2008, 06:50:17 am »
The oil squirters role is to help provide cooling to the piston allowing you to run higher operating tempatures with a turbo application.  They help wash down the underside of the piston .  This offers some protection against the higher operating temps.

Ceramic coating will help block the heat from getting into the piston.  Allowing you to run higher operating tempatures.

Same general effect.  Different approach.  Coating pistons is a lot easier than adding oil squirters.
2009 Jetta TDI Loyal edition, 6-spd. 16V 2.0CR


1985 VW Golf 5-spd, 4-door, 1.6NA  Bought from orig. owner in Savannah with 42,000 miles.
"Making the jump NA to TD" slow but sure.

1980 VW Rabbit LS 5-spd, 4-door 1.6NA almost 450,000miles  RIP

Reply #3March 08, 2008, 08:44:06 am

shegel

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 312
ceramic coating vs. oil squirters
« Reply #3 on: March 08, 2008, 08:44:06 am »
Quote from: "subsonic"


Same general effect.  Different approach.  Coating pistons is a lot easier than adding oil squirters.


thats what i wanted to hear. i was really not wanting to chance putting oil sqirters in.

thanks,
steve
1986 Golf 1.6l non turbo (R.I.P.)
1999.5 jetta (bought with 122145)
1969 karmann ghia(diesel swap dream)(most likely going to be subaru powered)
1998 jetta tdi (parents car)

Reply #4March 08, 2008, 08:46:37 am

jimfoo

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 2110
    • http://www.66rover.com
ceramic coating vs. oil squirters
« Reply #4 on: March 08, 2008, 08:46:37 am »
However there is no evidence as to which protects the pistons better. So be forewarned that ceramic may be better or worse than oil. And let everyone know if you find out that it isn't as good. :lol:
Jim
1966 Land-Rover 88" with 1.9 1Z which has been transformed to an M-TDI
TFO35 mechanically controlled VNT, IC , and 2.5" exhaust.
Driven daily

Reply #5March 08, 2008, 02:14:26 pm

jtanguay

  • Veteran

  • Offline
  • ***

  • 6879
ceramic coating vs. oil squirters
« Reply #5 on: March 08, 2008, 02:14:26 pm »
i'd be worried about the ceramic coating flaking off if it wasn't done properly... sooo much vibration inside our engines!!!


This is how we deal with porn spammers! You've been warned.